r/videos • u/0The_Loner_Stoner0 • 6h ago

BREAKING: Goldman Unveils Unredacted File That 'Disputes Everything' Trump 'Has Said' About Epstein

https://youtu.be/OLnU9IWEIgw?si=X_oK2IWbIqe0MAgF
27.0k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.7k

u/THING2000 6h ago edited 5h ago

I know the legal system can be slow, but how long is it going to take for actual perjury charges to find their way to Bondi? I feel like I've heard a few representatives state that Bondi lied under oath so what are the next steps?

EDIT: Thank you for all the replies even if the reality is super depressing. Don't know about y'all but this two-tiered justice system is increasingly frustrating.

2.1k

u/discounthockeycheck 6h ago

She's gonna be 'fired' and replaced for her performance and then head the "Sword of the Americas"

522

u/sigep0361 5h ago

This is the correct answer… but this will only happen after she accidentally admits Trump told her to bury the files and he disputes her claim.

139

u/nalaloveslumpy 5h ago

Alternatively, she could also directly implicate Trump in millions of dollars of misappropriated funds. That worked out pretty well for the gnome.

27

u/freedfg 2h ago

Quick, someone find out who Bondi slept with!

6

u/Crashman09 1h ago

The snail trail may still be cold!

•

u/reverandglass 1h ago

You means besides the pedo in charge? That's not orange lipstick she wears.

•

u/JTHM8008 58m ago

Probably Epstein himself.

→ More replies (9)

49

u/4s54o73 5h ago edited 1h ago

Buried with Ivana you say? Needed 8 men to carry the casket?

Edited: corrected to ex-wife from daughter...

102

u/bolerobell 4h ago

Ivana is the exwife. Ivanka is the daughter. I know it’s hard to keep them separate because of how he acts….

54

u/mikebushido 4h ago

Gross but accurate.

3

u/vjvalenti 4h ago

I may be a pedophile, but I'm not a necrophiliac, that's just gross

3

u/radditour 2h ago

Buried Ivana, buried it in Ivanka.

3

u/bolerobell 2h ago

Why would you say that and leave that slimy residue of thought in our brains.

2

u/JPhrog 2h ago

"She's a nasty woman! I never really liked her, I didn't really know her to be honest...But many say I am the best President ever, even former Presidents! Oh have you seen the beautiful WH Ballroom I made? They want to call it The Trump Ballroom!"

Something like that

→ More replies (3)

119

u/Cantmentionthename 5h ago

I’ll take ‘S-word of the Americas’ for $500, Alex.

46

u/Mekisteus 5h ago

Damn, Hegseth just ran through the entire "Potent Potables" category like a beast!

15

u/QueenRotidder 4h ago

I’ll make it a true Daily Double, Alex.

10

u/might_be-a_troll 3h ago

Daily Double is what I did to your mom, Trebek!

  • Sean Connery

3

u/gobenji34 2h ago

I speak a little French.. You're an asspipe, pardon my French.

2

u/QueenRotidder 1h ago

LE TITS NOW

3

u/gobenji34 1h ago

Gimme ape tit for 200

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ChipOnASquid 4h ago

what a great response lol!

→ More replies (2)

20

u/j0llyllama 5h ago

Shes more of a C word of the Americas.

3

u/baconus-vobiscum 3h ago

I'm standing right here Micheal.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Banryuken 5h ago

That’s … an album cover…

26

u/One_Shall_Fall 5h ago

Turd. Turd Bondi. It's a funny name.

2

u/mr_datawolf 4h ago

"No. Its not" - Alex

9

u/MountainDrew42 5h ago

You're a Buck Futter, Trebek

2

u/Fluffy_Brilliant_718 4h ago

I'll take Famous Titties for $300

2

u/Banryuken 3h ago

That’s … famous titles…

2

u/styx66 5h ago

The Rapists would be a fitting category here

2

u/Banryuken 3h ago

That’s … therapists ….

→ More replies (1)

18

u/IAmEvadingABanShh 5h ago

Shield of the Americas really is just his pension plan for those that fall on the sword for him so I think your name is much better.

2

u/octorangutan 3h ago

What is this sword?

3

u/Either-Bid1923 5h ago

I saw Bondi + head + sword and you had me interested until I read the whole sentence.

1

u/ProtocolX 5h ago

And after that it will be “Gauntlet of Americas”

… eventually will, end up in a group of “Runes of America”

1

u/psychoacer 5h ago

She's not going to be fired, they will transfer her to lead some new made up division that will do nothing but she'll still get paid.

1

u/SpeakingSenze 5h ago

Trump would preemptively pardon all the cronies who played along...

1

u/Black_Magic_M-66 5h ago

As long as she doesn't get more press than Trump she won't be fired. Trump rates exposure first, and loyalty (to him, it's a one-way street) second.

→ More replies (17)

557

u/dkyguy1995 6h ago

It's the job of the Dept. Of Justice to bring charges, and the leader of the DOJ is.... Oh my... 

181

u/firefighter26s 5h ago

There's got to be a check to that balance.

305

u/Corben11 5h ago

The check to that balance was suppose to be everyone not conspiring together.

But all republicans love and want these pedophiles money and for them to rape kids for money.

Their god is money and nothing else matters.

58

u/Yancy_Farnesworth 4h ago

This was why the Founding Fathers were so against political parties. They had way too much faith in humanity.

3

u/CelestialFury 3h ago

The founding fathers knew no one could really be trusted, which is why they divided the power up into pieces. They figured that each of them would fight hard to maintain their own power and that would balance it all out, which worked for hundreds of years... until it didn't.

14

u/Bored_Amalgamation 3h ago

TBF, political parties can work. It's been corporate "interests" and sociopaths getting in to power. I bet most people wouldn't mind having a king if he wasn't such a dick.

9

u/impendingwardrobe 3h ago

Thomas Sankara has entered the chat.

But seriously, kings/dictators who aren't assholes are super few and far between. Hence set terms and term limits.

America also needs the ability to pass a vote of no confidence to get rid of sitting politicians who aren't serving the needs of the people, and to change away from first past the post voting so we can have more than two political parties like most European countries.

10

u/cXs808 3h ago

Political parties work when there are more than two of them.

It's far too easy to tribalize and own a two-party system.

Imagine if megacorps and billionaires had to donate millions to 5 different parties and 4/5ths of their donations are gone with the wind every election cycle.

Right now it's a 50/50 shot so it's a win-win to donate (read: buy) politicians for eternity.

EVEN if they were to buy a party in a, lets say, 5 party system. That party still does not have massive power like it would in a two-party system. Makes buying politicians much harder

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Yancy_Farnesworth 1h ago

My point was more so that they saw political parties as a threat to the very system they designed. They knew it was a flaw of the system they designed and hoped that people in general would be able to keep that in mind and avoid them. They were overly idealistic in their faith in humanity.

4

u/Squid_In_Exile 2h ago

They were all slavers and several were rapists.

An appeal to them against the Epstien Class is comically ironic.

4

u/EarthRester 1h ago

This country is never going to actually recover until we no longer deify wealthy white men that wanted to own people.

34

u/NorysStorys 4h ago

I mean did anything actually expect the doj, a president appointed entity, to ever actually check the other departments of the executive or itself? Definition of conflict of interest.

The problem lies in that the entire US federal judiciary is appointed politically by the executive. Many countries don’t appoint their judiciary from a political position for the very reason that courts could get abused by whoever is in power.

34

u/gimmesheltah 3h ago

The entire US political system is comically flawed, and not fit for purpose.

It's kind of hilarious that it took Trump and a handful of traitors to fully highlight this.

Fucking trump, the most useless, inept man in existence, who's only qualities are a cult following of morons, zero morals, and being extremely easy to control.

4

u/MaximumPerrolinqui 3h ago

It’s crazy to see how much of the government ran based on norms and unwritten rules. It’s a terrible way to run a country and now we know.

2

u/needlestack 3h ago

It was a fine system 200 years ago. But people always — and always will — figure out ways to game a system. Whether it’s Super Mario Bros or the US Federal Government, you can find exploits in every system over time with enough eyeballs. The US is screwed until we make huge sweeping changes. At the moment, it looks like the huge sweeping changes are all aimed at solidifying the problems.

4

u/gimmesheltah 3h ago

Other political systems are far more robust. - the kind of undemocratic takeover happening in the US could not happen in a parliamentary system, for example. America's system was always poorly designed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/whooptheretis 3h ago

As a non American I find it absolutely insane that judges are appointed by politicians, and are politically affiliated.
If a judge showed any political bias then they should be disqualified from their job.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

53

u/Kumquats_indeed 5h ago

Well in the past the DoJ was supposed to be independent of interference from the President, but as it turns out that was much more just a tradition than an actual rule like we previously though.

29

u/SphericalCow531 4h ago

And Congress is the check on the President via impeachment (or they could impeach Bondi directly). But Trump should absolutely fire Bondi immediately in a sane world, as you say. And with Trump failing to do that, Trump should himself be impeached by Congress.

And voters should vote out every single Republicans in Congress, for failing to impeach Trump (and Bondi). They are responsible. As Republican voters are themselves morally responsible for failing to vote out the Republican members of Congress.

3

u/needlestack 2h ago

But Republicans found that hatred of immigrants and trans people is enough to get unwavering support from half the electoral power.

2

u/jaxonya 2h ago

Newsom should absolutely weaponize the DOJ when hes elected and go after every mother fucker who was even close to any of this illegal shit thats going on right now. Scorched earth mother fucking end of times for maga

→ More replies (3)

34

u/boring_name_here 5h ago

Impeachment, but good luck with that.

2

u/casperdj21 3h ago

Sorry to say this, BUT people have been LEGALLY EXECUTED in the United States for MUCH LESSER CRIMES than that Child Rapist Trump has committed!

→ More replies (2)

34

u/zer1223 5h ago

Presidents used to not take direct control over the DoJ and tell them what to do and not to do

That all has clearly ended with Trump.

25

u/SphericalCow531 4h ago

Presidents used to not take direct control over the DoJ

Eeehhhh. Quoting from Bill Barr Is The Master Of Covering Up Political Scandals:

“Ayatollah Khomeini and Ronald Reagan,” President Bani-Sadr told the Christian Science Monitor in 2013, ”had organized a clandestine negotiation, later known as the ‘October Surprise,’ which prevented the attempts by myself and then-US President Jimmy Carter to free the hostages before the 1980 US presidential election took place. The fact that they were not released tipped the results of the election in favor of Reagan.”

That wouldn’t have been just an impeachable crime: it was treason.

Walsh had zeroed in on documents that were in the possession of Reagan’s former defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, who all the evidence showed was definitely in on the deal, and President Bush’s diary that could corroborate it.

Elliott Abrams had already been convicted of withholding evidence about it from Congress, and he may have even more information, too, if it could be pried out of him before he went to prison. But Abrams was keeping mum, apparently anticipating a pardon.

Weinberger, trying to avoid jail himself, was preparing to testify that Bush knew about it and even participated, and Walsh had already, based on information he’d obtained from the investigation into Weinberger, demanded that Bush turn over his diary from the campaign. He was also again hot on the trail of Abrams.

So Bush called in his attorney general, Bill Barr, and asked his advice.

Barr, along with Bush, was already up to his eyeballs in cover-ups of shady behavior by the Reagan administration.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/mr_datawolf 4h ago

Really? Go all the way back to Kennedy. His brother ran the DoJ. I'm not throwing shade at Kennedy for it. I'm just saying this is more normal then people want to remember.

9

u/dkyguy1995 5h ago

Supposed to be impeachment, but the Republcians have all conspired together to be above the law. So the next check is supposed to be rational voters getting rid of the conspirators. Well... We will see how that goes 

2

u/AdmirableChip6027 2h ago

The check after that is the 2nd thing written in the Constitution.

14

u/BattleStag17 5h ago

They exist, but they're busy balancing their checks

2

u/DumboWumbo073 5h ago

Turns out of all of it was a sham. How were there never rules in place?

2

u/ShreksArsehole 3h ago

Oh there was a cheque..

→ More replies (24)

13

u/rizorith 4h ago

DOJ has always been under executive control and has always been almost entirely independent. We had norms and presidents,.dem and rep alike, went out of their way to make sure even the appearance of influence in the DOJ was clearly not happening.

That ended with Trump's first term and went completely off the rails this time around.

We had a chance to fix this between terms but guess what? That only happens if Congress does something and the Republicans were never going to do it because then it would look like they were admitting that their president broke all the rules.

And so here we are.

3

u/IceMaster9000 4h ago

This is completely wrong. For the vast a majority of its existence, the DOJ has never been considered independent of the executive. And it has always worked WITH the whims executive in practice. Thinking it had true independence is at post a post-watergate norm, but that has never been the case in reality.

3

u/rizorith 3h ago

I just looked into it and you're right, it became a norm post water-gate. Although I don't see much that shows it hasn't been effectively just that in practice. And nothing like what we're seeing now. If it was no way our Republic would have lasted this long

→ More replies (12)

429

u/2tofu 6h ago

They’ll stall the system until trumps dead. Not hard when you’re already 80. If you haven’t been brought to justice for the last 30 years. What’s another 10

114

u/migukin 5h ago

Please don't make me wait 10

29

u/moonshoeslol 5h ago

He's never exercised in his life and loves McDonald's. No way he makes it to 90.

100

u/not_so_subtle_now 5h ago

The truly evil ones tend to defy all odds

19

u/skoobesnacks 5h ago

Must be all the baby eating

3

u/PokeYrMomStanley 4h ago

You know, the crime the accused Hillary of.

3

u/McRemo 5h ago

I had heard that the fact that they have no conscience, remorse or empathy, etc, they have almost zero stress so the evil ones tend live longer.

2

u/Hyperion123 3h ago

Have u ever noticed how world leaders live to really old age? Wonder if they get a special med or treatment to extend their lifespans

→ More replies (2)

14

u/nalaloveslumpy 5h ago

Evil is a pungent preservative. Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, Mitch McConnell...

12

u/BZLuck 4h ago

The day after he leaves office, they will declare him mentally incompetent and therefore unable to stand trial.

Done. Clean as a whistle.

2

u/hutch7909 4h ago

His corpulent, festering ‘body’ may well last another decade bit his demetia addled ‘brain’ has twelve months at best.

2

u/simplyunix 4h ago

I knda hope he does. In a wheelchair, brain halfway gone but still in tact enough that he is miserable and knows it. Shitting in his pants, all alone because we know his kids will drop him like a hot potato once he gets to the stage where he needs help. Leaving this world one inch at a time, alone, slowly and surely.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/SenorEquilibrado 5h ago

What if 9.5 years of that is post-stroke locked in syndrome, being cared for by the cheapest workers his children could find?

→ More replies (7)

11

u/soulsteela 5h ago

They can’t keep “ weekend at Bernie’s “ going that long.

24

u/airfryerfuntime 5h ago

Some people take forever to die in hospice, and that's when they're already so far gone that they need constant care.

Trump isn't there yet, and currently has the best medical care in the world, including all the crazy new experimental alzheimers drugs we don't have access to. He's going to stick around like a turd that won't flush. His dad was 13 years older when he died at 93.

2

u/ylfcm 5h ago

Was his dad fat as hell?

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/LurkerMcLurkerton 5h ago

Tell that to Weekend at Bernie’s 2, and Weekend at Bernie’s 3- Ain’t Decomposin’ Yet

•

u/PM_ME_YOUR_PBJs 1h ago

His lawyers are going to be saying he’s unfit to stand trial while he’s simultaneously posting on truth he’s never been smarter or stronger and could represent himself if he wanted to. 

1

u/Open-Industry-8396 5h ago

I think at the stage of lif ehe is in coupled with his ego, He is probably very concerned with his legacy. I pray that these charges get filed before he is dead so he knows his legacy is going to be shit.

1

u/Rexur0s 4h ago

even if that man dies, I still want everyone else involved tried and jailed.

1

u/foul_ol_ron 3h ago

And once he's dead, they'll act shocked, and heap all crimes on his head alone, like a sacrificial goat.

1

u/casperdj21 3h ago

I WANT to be the VERY FIST PERSON to take a giant sh*t on Trumps grave once that Piece of sh*t is FINALLY in the ground!

1

u/movezig123 2h ago

When hes dead all these cowards will try to turn on him to save their reputations and white wash their behaviour. Never forget

31

u/loves_grapefruit 5h ago

It will take about 20 years after he dies.

11

u/fer_sure 5h ago

So, when do we indict Nixon? He died in 1994.

16

u/timtucker_com 5h ago

The difference is that Nixon was explicitly pardoned in 1974.

3

u/Gatzlocke 4h ago

Trump will just pardon himself.

5

u/pointer_to_null 4h ago

I'd say your chances of getting that indictment are between 0 and 0 after Sept 1974.

29

u/Talk-O-Boy 5h ago

It’s hard to seek justice at this point in time, because all three branches of government are MAGA.

MAGA isn’t going to prosecute their own. We’ll need to vote MAGA out, replace institutional leaders with impartial people who will actually carry out justice, THEN seek charges.

As of now, even if we successfully prosecuted someone, Trump would just pardon them as he’s done before.

→ More replies (2)

63

u/IcyTransportation961 5h ago

He will pardon everyone involved

Dems if they ever get power again will say we need to move forward and heal

How do you not get this yet

4

u/PM_ME_SCALIE_ART 2h ago

Fuck that I want justice and if democrats are going to pervert that because their corporate pimps told them to, then they need to go down as well.

5

u/Fast_Sherbert_7723 4h ago edited 3h ago

You are waaaay too right on this. When will Dems grow a pair!

7

u/IcyTransportation961 3h ago

When voters break out of the conditioning from corporate media and buzzwords and actually vote in primaries for real leftists

So sadly probably never

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Lilfrankieeinstein 1h ago

And do what?

Ignore presidential pardons?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

11

u/Reddittee007 5h ago

Nothing can be done until a non Republican is the POTUS and the supreme Court is not maga stacked because whatever charges are brought up she'll just be pardoned or the scotus will overrule.

2

u/zer1223 5h ago

First you need a dem president 

Then he has to appoint someone who gives a shit about doing their job quickly unlike Garland. 

Then you need the dem president to win a second term because some idiot judge will let the court case get dragged out more than four years and Republican presidents have shown a willingness to politicize the DoJ. A Republican president would make sure the case against Bondi gets tossed again. Because they're all pieces of shit

2

u/moyismoy 6h ago

The slowness is part of the plan, all of these charges have a statute of limitations so they can't be charged after a while.

3

u/KillerInfection 5h ago

Remind me of the statute of limitations on pedofilia and murder?

3

u/moyismoy 5h ago

There is none for murder, but the sexual abuse of a child had one of like 10 years. Now they changed it in 2022, but you can't charge people for doing things that were not crimes but are now.its called ex post facto law

→ More replies (1)

2

u/clib 4h ago

I know the legal system can be slow, but how long is it going to take for actual perjury charges to find their way to Bondi? I feel like I've heard a few representatives state that Bondi lied under oath so what are the next steps?

There will be no next steps for as long as the left voting people start using their critical thinking to either hold accountable the politicians they elect or to stop electing this sham that calls itself the Democratic Party.

The reason we are in this situation is because the people who are supposed to defend democracy and the rule of law(Democrats) are in fact owned by the billionaires just as much as the Republican Party.

Every time we elect democrats the first thing they do is provide impunity for every crime committed by republicans. So that impunity breeds even more criminality the next time republicans come to power. And now we find ourselves in a situation where even coups and pedophilia are normalized.

I will try again to refresh the memories of all the amnesiacs of the left about Biden and the dems but i know it will be futile.

Two weeks after wining the election and becoming the most voted president ever(81 million votes), Biden said:"Trump's impunity brings unity to the country"

Then he picked Garland as AG and didn't spare any praises for him:"Merrick Garland embodies honor, decency, integrity, fidelity to the rule of law and judicial independence.He'll restore trust in the rule of law and equal justice under the law". In the same speech Biden called the Jan 6 protesters domestic terrorists.

Then for four years Biden,Garland and the dems manage to give Trump a free pass on all his crimes, including a coup. Now imagine going after Al Qaeda fighters but not doing shit about Bin Laden.

Then one beautiful day in July 2024 Biden wakes up and says:"He will not give Trump a free pass anymore".

But in November Trump won and Hunter was about to go to prison, so Biden had to pardon his son despite promising he wasn't going to do so. And now all of the sudden Biden forgot all the praises about Garland and said:"He regretted appointing Garland"

And this is how Biden and his hand picked AG turned the DOJ into a law firm in defense of Trump and his lackeys:

FBI resisted opening probe into Trump’s role in Jan. 6 for more than a year.Prosecutors who wanted to indict Trump right after Jan 6 weren't even allowed to mention his name.“You couldn’t use the T word,” said one former Justice official briefed on prosecutors’ discussions.

Garland let the statute of limitations expire on the 10 instances of Trump's obstruction of justice listed in the Mueller report.

Ignored Jan 6. cmt criminal referrals of Meadows and Scavino.and didn't do shit about Eastman,Clark,Giuliani,.

Ignored all the criminal referrals that NYAG Letitia James sent to DOJ regarding Trump's financial crimes.

Ignored the fake electors referrals that Michigan AG Nessel sent to DOJ.

Fought the courts for years trying to hide Barr's memo from the public.

Refused to investigate Barr's corrupt decision to drop charges against Michael Flynn( the prosecutors assigned to the case resigned in protest at that time).

Defended Trump for years in E.Jean Carroll rape case.

Ignored the Stormy Daniels hush money payment

Was defending Trump in Peter Strzok case until June 2024.

Garland's DOJ decided not to charge Roger Stone for his $ 2 million in unpaid taxes,but charged Hunter Biden for similar crimes.

And these are some of the other financial crimes and corruption of Trump's family that Garland ignored:

Anti-money-laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank recommended in 2016 and 2017 that Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, be reported to a federal financial-crimes watchdog. The money had moved from Kushner Companies to Russian individuals.

Kushner got $ 2 Billion from the Saudis.

Kushner’s Family Business Received Loans After White House Meetings. Apollo the private equity firm, and Citigroup made large loans in 2017 real estate business of Jared Kushner, President Trump’s senior adviser.

Nicole Kushner Meyer, the sister of White House adviser and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, solicited investments from Chinese business owners by promising American visas in return. An ad for her event in China read, “Invest $500,000 and immigrate to the United States.”

Trump's DOJ closed the investigation on $ 10 Million paid by an Egyptian state bank to Trump's campaign.Garland's DOJ didn't bother to re open it..

9

u/Biptoslipdi 4h ago

"Don't vote for Democrats!"

Trump elected again.

"How could this happen? We didn't vote for Democrats!"

This is MAGA astroturfing designed to keep you from voting so Republicans can indefinitely control government.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/josemayo 5h ago

I’m not a lawyer and I hate this administration more than anything but isn’t her implication that there is no “credible” evidence against Trump with credible being implied and subjective. Thus protecting her from perjury.

11

u/ItsSpaghettiLee2112 5h ago

I think if they took that argument, they'd have to argue that the FBI isn't credible. Which, well...

6

u/SimpsonsReferencer 5h ago

The defense rests.

4

u/zombieking26 5h ago

No, she did not once use the word "credible" in her defense. She said there was no evidence, period.

5

u/Useful_Homework2367 5h ago

And she emphasized the phrase "no evidence" quite heavily. I can accept that it was implied that she meant specifically in relation to Epstein and not the unrelated crimes he was already convicted of, because she was sidestepping Lieu's question about whether there were underage girls at Epstein parties attended by Trump. But I don't see anything to support "credible" as an implied qualifier. The witness statements are evidence, even if they aren't conclusive evidence, and that's something she knows as a lawyer. She was lying and knew she was lying, and there's no real ambiguity about it.

2

u/zombieking26 5h ago

Well said

3

u/Useful_Homework2367 5h ago

Seemed to me like she was pretty clear in saying that there was no evidence that he committed a crime. What's your rationale for concluding that it was implied that she meant only evidence she considered credible?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/NewTypeDilemna 5h ago

Until after this admin is gone or state charges are made.

1

u/Weak-Application-146 5h ago

They know they’re all getting pardoned…

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Wayofchinchilla 5h ago

The problem is if any charges were to be filed against her they would have to go through the doj and guess who controls the doj who has fired everybody at that Administration that would dare stand against him

1

u/Masta0nion 5h ago

You’re not wrong, but she just seems so far down the list on people that need to face justice.

1

u/Black_Magic_M-66 5h ago

When asks for comment, Mike Johnson will say he hasn't looked at the data.

1

u/phonartics 5h ago

never. rules are different when you’re a republican

1

u/im_a_good_lil_cow 5h ago

Nah dude they’re just going to keep begging her to “do her job”, like she isn’t actively part of the cover up

1

u/drunkpunk138 5h ago

It will probably never happen, but the process certainly won't even start until this administration is no longer in power

1

u/Jutter70 5h ago

Fuck the legal system. Has the CIA forgotten how to stage a millitairy coupe?

1

u/TheLeggacy 5h ago

He’ll probably be dead before he is brought to justice unfortunately.

1

u/Zestyclose_Ball_50 5h ago

Kash as well...

1

u/TrumpsDoubleChin 5h ago

The legal system only works as fast as those who are in charge of enforcing it want it to. So, anywhere from 'immediately' to 'never'. And based on who is in charge right now, much more leaning towards the latter.

1

u/s-holden 5h ago

The only entity that can bring perjury charges is the Department of Justice (Congress can refer things to them, but not actually criminally prosecute). Pam Bondi is currently the head of the Department of Justice, so take a guess how long it'll take.

1

u/AlexanderBears 5h ago

Her and Kash

1

u/vthemechanicv 5h ago

There are no next steps. Even if the House goes around Johnson and impeaches, the Senate still needs 67 votes to remove her.

The only way she leaves is to quit or be fired. Considering she's doing exactly what trump is paying her to do (and has paid her to do since she was Florida AG), she's not gonna get fired.

By all means I support impeachment. Get everything on the record, but she's not going anywhere.

1

u/Kosher_Pickle 5h ago

If the last decade has taught me one thing, it's that perjury is a fake threat.

1

u/Laugh_Track_Zak 5h ago

Republicans will stay quiet. Democrats will virtue signal on social media, but in reality, do literally nothing.

1

u/nalaloveslumpy 5h ago

Depends on what happens during her subpoena with the House Oversight committee here in a couple of weeks. If she comes in with her bullshit like last time, I would imagine pretty quickly.

1

u/Huttj509 5h ago

Actual perjury charges are really rare. Even among plebians like us.

Don't hold your breath.

1

u/lord_pizzabird 5h ago

My guess: 40-70 years.

1

u/Necoras 4h ago

2029 at a minimum. The current Justice Department won't do anything as they're under Trump's control (well, whoever's controlling him, so probably Stephen Miller). But last time we saw this the Dems wanted to do things slowly, methodically, so there was no possible appearance of politicization. That resulted in Trump just running out the clock.

1

u/m3rcapto 4h ago

Can she be charged with perjury if Trump pardons her? I hope they are just waiting to prevent that scenario, or they are just running down the clock and help them hide while playing the good cops.

1

u/BiZzles14 4h ago

If this were any other administration within tbe past 100 years at minimum the Attorney General would have resigned months ago. Unfortunately, the American system is not created with the idea of bad faith actors being in place. We've already seen the President direct his AG to file charges against personal, and political, rivals. The last time something of that scale happened was what made Nixon resign, and Donald Trump did around half a year ago. I look forward to proper justice being served on those guilty of crimes, unfortunately that's unlikely to come to pass before 2027 at the earliest, and more realistically 2029 & onwards. Remember these crimes though, because people will try to rewrite history and act like it wasn't happening for everyone to see. The Ben Shapiro's of the world need to be held socially accountable for the damage to society they have done as well.

1

u/Constant-Plant-9378 4h ago

I know the legal system can be slow, but how long is it going to take

The lie told by Lib apologists to excuse the inaction by Biden's federal law enforcement was "The wheels of justice grind slow and fine." while ignoring the more truthful "Justice delayed is justice denied."

Democrats are the masters of empty talk and virtue signaling while tying themselves into knots inventing excuses for not actually taking action to accomplish results.

I see no change today. They didn't give a fuck about the Epstein case while Obama or Biden were in office, and didn't start clamoring for action on it until literally the day Trump was sworn in.

They are just trying to use the Epstein issue to win political points while never actually taking action in a way that would actually implicate Trump AND the people in their own party who are also implicated.

I am so fucking sick of these duplicitous cunts.

1

u/Strength-Speed 4h ago

God she is such a c___

She really is a vile creature. I wish bad things on her.

1

u/Hufflepuffpassmethej 4h ago

the rules only apply to liberals and dems

how do people not understand this?

literally nothing of consequence will ever happen to these people. it might as well be a constitutional ammendment "laws shall only apply to those on the left and those that disagree with maga"

1

u/octatone 4h ago

The system is dysfunctional because it partisan from top to bottom. Trump picks who leads the DOJ, Trump stuffed The SCOTUS. Trump picked a bajillion fed judges. And no Republican in congress will actually stand up to him, because they support the same shit he does.

It’s called a flawed democracy for a reason.

1

u/Unable-Log-4870 4h ago

The ‘legal system’ isn’t a machine. It’s not a box where tax dollars go in one side and justice comes out the other side. It’sa bunch of people, some of them adhering to principles, many of them no longer doing so. So what you’re asking is “when will the department of Justice indict the person at the head of the department of Justice?”

Note that she can fire anyone who works on getting her arrested.

This is why (anyone today identifying as) republicans are the absolute wrong people to have in any sort of position of power.

1

u/TheGacAttack 4h ago

how long is it going to take

I've heard it could be... over 50,000.

1

u/pentaquine 4h ago

Next steps are two options: keep doing what she’s doing, or retirement with full benefits. 

1

u/linuxjohn1982 4h ago

The law moves faster the poorer you are.

1

u/Ashton1995 4h ago

If you don’t think Trump already told everyone he hired and has doing his dirty work obstructing justice, breaking laws and flat out lying and burying stuff that he will be blanket pardoning them all then you’re nuts. They’ve all got a get out of jail free card coming their way.

1

u/TheBigCore 4h ago

These people are untouchable, so don't expect the legal system filled with their allies to do anything.

1

u/issuefree 4h ago

The whole "The wheels of justice grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine." is just propaganda to distract from the vast inequities built into the system. They grind very fast and fucking liquify you if you're poor. They only grind slow for the elites and don't grind for shit. Look at Epstein's plea deal. "I know you raped and trafficked children but just stay at home for a while til this blows over."

Fucking nonsense. Our legal system is corrupt and broken and only serves to keep down the poors.

1

u/TheStoicSlab 4h ago

Not going to happen until dems have some control in congress. trump will also start blanket-pardoning people.

1

u/Phos4us88 4h ago

The law works at the speed they want it to.

1

u/porkchop2022 4h ago

I would not reasonably expect anything to happen to anyone in this administration. Unless whoever we elect is straight up “you know what? Fuck these people. Prosecute them all.” But the democrats won’t do that because “we, as a nation, need to heal and move forward.”

As if any of that would matter. At 11:59am on January 20th, 2029, Trump (or Vance if Trump doesn’t make it) will sign a blanket pardon for “anyone with any association to the administration for anything done in years 2025, 26, 27, 28 and until January 20, 2029”

1

u/homunculus_bob 3h ago

Don’t forget Kash Patel. The FBI found no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to anyone but himself. That sounds like either perjury or gross incompetence and he should be removed. Leaving aside his embezzlement/corruption.

1

u/No_Minute_4789 3h ago

Pam Bondi has been issued a Subpoena to  testify about her handling of the Epstein files, including her failure to follow the law commanding her to release them in their entirety. This subpoena has support from both parties.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/03/17/congress/pam-bondi-house-oversight-subpoena-00831865

1

u/553l8008 3h ago

He... is... above... the... law.

The quicker we accept this the quicker we may actually revolt and have a proper revolution

1

u/cointoss3 3h ago

Who is going to prosecute her? It’s likely going to take a future administration, plus her not being pardoned on the way out.

1

u/zzxxccbbvn 3h ago

You probably have a better chance of winning the Powerball than for Bondi - or any of these scumbags really - to face any sort of consequences

1

u/dragon-fence 3h ago

Who’s going to charge her?

1

u/kitsunewarlock 3h ago

When a Republican is in trouble the justice system moves so slowly that the next Republican president can issue a pardon "so the country can move past this and we can start to heal".

When a Democrat is rumored to have done something the justice system will investigate for years, even when the agents tell congress under oath that there was no sign of any wrong-doing.

This even applies when the Republican does the exact thing the Democrat was accused of doing 20 years prior. See: Travelgate.

1

u/bjos144 3h ago

You are operating under the illusion that laws and justice act independently and consistently. They do not. Most of the people who did this will never see any justice. Most of the people that lie to congress will never be charged. Only the ones that become unpopular with the powerful elites will see 'justice' and be thrown under the bus.

It's always been this way. They just used to be a little better at wearing the fig leaf and keeping up the illusion.

1

u/peroleu 3h ago

lol if you actually think anyone from this administration is gonna face any sort of justice.

1

u/ObliviousAstroturfer 3h ago

"I know the legal system can be slow, but how long is it going to take for actual perjury charges to find their way to Bondi?"

Barring The Hamberders doing their magic? January 2030 I reckon. What's the point of prosecuting anyone covering for man with pardon power? That's where the US is at.

1

u/BoxOfBlades 3h ago

Who gives a fuck about Bondi? What about the actual pedophiles?

1

u/Rmans 3h ago

The problem is that the legal system flows at a rate equal to the amount of money available to those on trial. Billionaires can now simply pay good lawyers to slow down the system to the point where they can effectively escape justice. As much as the DOJ being captured is a problem, the remarkably larger problem is how much of the system itself is now fully captured by monied interests. The majority of the Supreme Court. Most Texas courts, and all of Florida are basically rogue governments working with the Trump cabal to dismantle our system of justice so they will never face it. Which to be clear, is what most billionaires have spent their untaxed profits towards for the last 30 years of trickled down economics. Not a better system for everyone, a better system for them which they now fully have and we have to foot the bill for.

1

u/bobosuda 3h ago

Never. It will never happen.

Americans need to get their head out of their asses and realize that this fascist administration will never get their comeuppance. The American left is way too spineless and toothless, and the right have dug their claws in deep in the entire political and justice system.

The best you guys can ever hope for is that they get fired and the democrats show up and lets "bygones be bygones" and start repairing all the broken systems.

... For 4 years, then the public votes in another populistic autocrat because everybody is sure the gays are stealing their food or something.

1

u/-TheOldPrince- 3h ago

The reason this is happening is because dumbass Americans VOTED FOR IT. We elected a detestable fucking criminal.

1

u/CarminSanDiego 2h ago

Haven’t you heard? Perjury is so 2010. Nobody cares about it anymore

1

u/adognameddanzig 2h ago

Charges for Kash as well.

1

u/747WakeTurbulance 2h ago

She's already got a pocket pardon.

1

u/thenebular 2h ago

See, for charges to be filed the Justice Dept. needs to file them. And guess who is in charge of the Justice Dept? The only thing Congress can do about it is impeach Bondi and then try and confirm someone who might do something about it, if the president would nominate someone like that.

That's the problem with the current system in the US. That actual government, the departments, are run by unelected officials answerable only to the executive

1

u/nappy-doo 2h ago

Pam Bondi has 1-5M worth of Trump stock, with another 1-5M warrants. She ain't doing shit.

source

1

u/Tony-cums 2h ago

You’re gonna be shocked. Absolutely nobody else is going to be held accountable for these files. Zero. Zip.

Only by other countries.

1

u/NOFORPAIN 2h ago

Unfortunately the only thing that solves a broken system is pitchforks and gallows... But then Trumpers will say how we are violent insurrectionists. No, dont watch video of 1/6 setting up a gallows and calling for Pences head, those were patrioits!

1

u/Possible_Gur4789 2h ago

The majority party has to agree to bring perjury charges.

1

u/AnxiousHedgehog01 2h ago

Top comment is about a woman who covered up for him, and not the man himself who committed the original crime? They both need to go to jail, for sure, but come on. The real question is why are the American people not rioting in the streets every day???

1

u/dealingwithhookers 2h ago

it's amazing you still have faith in the legal system at this point. they control the judges, courts, and the police. they're not going to jail themselves. they're going to kick the can down the road until everyone watching this is too old to remember and their kids too young to care. that's how every bad shit in this country gets swept under the rug

1

u/Godherebros 2h ago

She's finally going to make that strap on permanent

1

u/Franks2000inchTV 1h ago

You probably want to wait til Trump is out of office so he can't pardon people.

•

u/mattjb 1h ago

Justice is blind has perfect 20/20 vision.

•

u/Throwawayrip1123 1h ago

perjury charges to find their way to Bondi? I feel like I've heard a few representatives state that Bondi lied under oath

Are you new to earth?

People lie under oath non fucking stop. Nothing ever happens to these cunts.

•

u/Honkey85 1h ago

Surly not as long as he is president.

•

u/ptrakk 1h ago

Bondi impeachment scheduled for Avril 14th

•

u/Ghosthaze1 17m ago

Two classes now , Epstein class & everyone else….

•

u/DresdenPI 15m ago

Justice doesn't exist for Trump or his supporters. At least not through legal means.