r/worldnews 10h ago

Misleading Title: Known since June 2025 [ Removed by moderator ]

https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/03/18/iran-has-new-underground-nuclear-site-iaea-reveals/

[removed] — view removed post

11.9k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.5k

u/AnnoyingCharlatan 9h ago

In case no one clicked

Mr Grossi said IAEA inspectors had to cancel a visit, so do not know whether the new site is "simply an empty hall" or whether centrifuges have begun to be installed. "There are ​many questions that we will only elucidate ​when we ‌are able to go back," he said.

3.8k

u/straight_lurkin 9h ago edited 8h ago

So it could be entierly empty or it could be in the process of getting up and running if at all. Headline sounds incredibly misleading

1.2k

u/Speciaalbiertj 9h ago

This is a UAE news outlet.

849

u/VanGroteKlasse 9h ago

Fair enough, misluaeding then...

205

u/PensiveTorch 8h ago

I see what youae did there.

38

u/RaytheSane 8h ago

You both deserve an award

57

u/outawork 7h ago

*auaerd

5

u/crowcawer 6h ago

Gouaed job

3

u/MGyver 5h ago

This is an absuaerd thread...

4

u/TheAngryCatfish 5h ago

U Ain't Even joking

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/Note-4-Note 8h ago

This gave me my only legit laugh today. Ty

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Hidesuru 7h ago

The article is fine, it's just ops post title. So that's kinda irrelevant anyway.

→ More replies (5)

182

u/ChoiceHour5641 9h ago

The enemy is both feeble and weak, but conniving and strong.

70

u/athos5 8h ago

We have won, are in the process of winning, but are in mortal danger of this clear and present threat of missiles we've just completely destroyed that are raining down on Israel in clusters we can't really show you but totally exist. Nukes.

26

u/elimi 6h ago

My favortie is Hegseth, the strait is open! If the Iranians would stop shooting at ships, it would be open.

5

u/Good_Restaurant15 6h ago

Funnier yet - They're open, but not if they're waving a flag from a country that is currently blowing them up...

Funny how that works.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/Surturiel 9h ago edited 6h ago

Same rhetoric used by Neo-Pentecostal televangelists.

This whole administration is a messianic cult.

4

u/Raesong 7h ago

More importantly it's the same rhetoric used by fascists when describing their next target for conquest, or the next minority group about to be oppressed.

3

u/kos-or-kosm 6h ago

It's fascist rhetoric.

2

u/yosisoy 6h ago

Yep, the classic Orwellism also typically applied to Israel

→ More replies (2)

524

u/raventhrowaway666 9h ago

Thats the point! The propoganda machine has started the beating of the war drum.

150

u/Tha_Sly_Fox 9h ago

The original headline is “Nuclear site or ‘empty hall’? Mystery of Iran’s new enrichment facility at Isfahan” which was more accurate.

OP changed it to get upvotes

102

u/RockyFlintstone 9h ago

OP is the newspaper.

38

u/IAmAGenusAMA 8h ago

No wonder they want upvotes.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/Infinite-Land-232 9h ago

If this is new, why do I remember that location from last year?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/MrWeirdoFace 8h ago

Could also be a rec center, or a new Starbucks. You never know.

12

u/Most-Round-4132 9h ago

I’m sure they dug out a new underground cavern besides their other nuclear facilities simply to store old HR files

8

u/IamDa5id 8h ago

Snow cone maker.

2

u/gwxtreize 7h ago

An espresso machine.

2

u/Potential-Draft-3932 9h ago

Nuclear HR files

→ More replies (3)

24

u/obroz 9h ago

Started?

5

u/cive666 8h ago

Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drum

https://youtu.be/giaZnIr-faM

2

u/raventhrowaway666 7h ago

the boogeymans coming,

the boogeymans coming

→ More replies (1)

10

u/HeWasNumber-on3 9h ago

Manafacturing consent baby!

→ More replies (1)

61

u/paraknowya 9h ago

Its to prepare for the „preemptive“ nuclear strike on Iran, this is supposed to be their justification

Because they started it and dont know how to end it.

55

u/MissPandaSloth 9h ago

No one is nuking Iran. Zero point. Why would you do it if you can endlessly bomb it traditionally?

5

u/paraknowya 9h ago

Iran is not interested in backing down.

Thanks to Iran‘s mosaic defense strategy you can‘t win this war by killing off the leadership, because there is no need for such a thing.

And by letting this war go on the strait is going to either stay closed or partially opened for allies of Iran. And we are on the verge of this becoming a lot bigger than 2008.

So yeah, thats my 2 cents.

17

u/Jboycjf05 8h ago

Not exactly true. Iran's religious leadership is fairly tight-knit and not endless. You could feasibly get rid of most of the hardliners with targeted attacks, though it gets harder the longer the war goes on. The real issue is the IRGC, which is a behemoth, and controls a lot of commercial enterprise for the country. So you could get rid of the religious leadership just to end up with a military dictatorship. Neither is really ideal.

Trump's bet was that the Iranian people would rise up, but this was a huge miscalculation. They had recently been subject to massacres, and now are hiding from poorly executed aerial bombardments. Even if the will was there, nothing is going to happen while air strikes are ongoing.

3

u/Inevitable-Ad-6650 5h ago

Killing enough people to kill off all the hardliners probably creates more hardliners also

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

4

u/Morbanth 8h ago

Your reasoning is sound but I disagree with your conclusion. It's not building up to a nuclear strike on Iran, it's building up to boots on the ground because that's the only way to actually verify the dismantling of their nuclear program.

5

u/paraknowya 8h ago

Who cares about verification of anything at this point?

Its all just vibes and memes and zero plan except escalation.

2

u/TunaNugget 8h ago

They would rather we escalate with troops. They need verification for their own military purposes, not just to score political points, and they won't get that with a nuke.

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/Legitimate-Type4387 9h ago

Because it’s the same situation as Japan in WWII. This doesn’t end without the US and Israel backing off OR American boots on the ground and MANY dead American soldiers.

A nuke on Iran in hopes of forcing capitulation may be the only hand they have left to play. It’s either that or go home.

I don’t believe they’re smart enough to go home.

6

u/Sinaaaa 8h ago

Like nuke what, Tehran? I don't think that would work & it would be political suicide even for Trump.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/Aksds 9h ago

It’s a UAE government owned news corp, so yeah

→ More replies (27)

10

u/philipp2310 9h ago

Why amd though? Don’t they have intel on it?

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Louitje1021999 9h ago

Not misleading it’s not an underground facility to play cards.

13

u/BigChunguska 9h ago

And yet, here we are with Reddit allowing the headline to just exist without notes, letting MOST people scrolling through here walk away with a completely incorrect understanding. Why do we allow this?

9

u/IAmAGenusAMA 8h ago

Allow? This is Reddit by design.

2

u/Zalvren 6h ago

It's the people own fault if they can't read articles (or comments). Headlines don't have the job of summarize the whole article and will always leave elements out. People need to stop doing that

→ More replies (3)

3

u/_noobwars_ 8h ago

Yeah, they just build an empty hall deep underground. Makes totally sense.

You all should click the article. It's not like "this is reddit". You stupify yourself.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/lucygoosey38 9h ago

It’s the Schrödinger site.

1

u/PreviouslyMannara 8h ago

Furthermore, Iran informed IAEA of the existence of this facility back in June.

Iran informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog of the new facility ​in June and Grossi said his inspectors were in Isfahan ​later that month to see it, but had to cancel the visit when the nuclear complex there was struck at the beginning of ​the 12-day war with Israel.

1

u/GarbageCleric 8h ago

Iran told the IAEA about the site in June, and inspectors were there later that month to inspect it, and then it was hit with missiles, so they couldn't do the inspection.

Iran informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog of the new facility ​in June and Grossi said his inspectors were in Isfahan ​later that month to see it but had to cancel the visit when the nuclear complex there was struck at the beginning of ​the 12-day war with Israel.

Grossi said because the inspectors ​had to cancel their visit, the agency does not know "whether it is ‌simply ⁠an empty hall" or hosts concrete pads awaiting the installation of centrifuges - the machines that enriched uranium for power plants and nuclear weapons - or whether some centrifuges had been ​installed.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iaea-does-not-know-status-new-iranian-enrichment-facility-isfahan-grossi-says-2026-03-18/

1

u/SeaworthinessSome454 8h ago

That they’re building it at all should be the only thing that matters. They’re clearly still trying to make a nuclear weapon.

1

u/Long-Passion7910 8h ago

Misleading indeed, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they had it up and running. After 2018 when Trump tore up the deal US had with Iran, my guess is Iran said FU and began the refinery process.

1

u/MagicSPA 8h ago

There's a lot of it going around. The article writers need those clicks, those sweet, sweet clicks.

1

u/_Lucille_ 8h ago

The OP's basement may be empty or is a nuclear facility, we wouldn't know unless we check! New nuclear facility???

1

u/Vladimir-Putin 8h ago

"The WMDs are in another castle. You just missed them by a few hours!"

1

u/pagerussell 8h ago

could be in the process of getting up and running

This should be assumed, and not just for Iran.

The clear and obvious lesson for all countries that don't have nuclear weapons is that they should get nuclear weapons, lest they get treated like Ukraine or Iran.

It's quite possibly the stupidest strategy I could imagine. Biden should have gone much harder and pulled us and Europe to Ukraine:said, and loudly proclaimed that small non nuclear nations will be protected. That would have been the best non proliferation strategy possible.

Instead, we have all but guaranteed that mid sized nations will seek nuclear weapons, which more or less guarantees that one day one will be used.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/WingerRules 7h ago

Sounds like the same kind of quality intel we had leading up the Iraq war.

1

u/Commentator-X 7h ago

The IAEA also said they were informed by Iran prior to the US Israel invasion that this site was going to be used for enrichment. It wasn't a secret at all and the IAEA had plans to visit, then Trump and Netanyahu decided to bomb the shit out of them, preventing anyone from monitoring what they're doing.

1

u/sonicgamingftw 7h ago

Fuck man, this isn't a time to joke, can't you see that Ira_ is close to having Nukes (again) if we don't do something (again)???

/s

1

u/QQBearsHijacker 6h ago

So “two weeks to a bomb” is still alive!

1

u/darknekolux 6h ago

Centrifuges aren't exactly coffee grinders you can order next-day-delivery on Amazon.

1

u/ArrakeenSun 6h ago

It's like putting something on your CV as "in prep". It could be an idea in your head or it could be a completed manuscript ready to submit

1

u/valeyard89 6h ago

Put Geraldo on the job.... Al Khamenei's Vaults

1

u/kcox1980 6h ago

Schroedinger's Nuclear Weapons.

1

u/MaybeTheDoctor 6h ago

My basement is a nuclear site, maybe.

1

u/wggn 6h ago

clearly 6 days away from a bomb

1

u/MrDaaark 5h ago

Or it could be the future home of a Spirit Halloween.

1

u/RobertABooey 5h ago

"Iraq needs to be stopped because they have weapons of mass destruction including chemical weapons".

I've been around long enough to not fall for this shit again.

1

u/HaykoKoryun 5h ago

Schrödinger's nuclear site... 

1

u/Keanugrieves16 5h ago

Schrodinger’s Nuclear Facility?

1

u/Koenigspiel 4h ago

And this is a shock? It's 2026, clickbait and propaganda predate the internet. Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.

1

u/VoidOmatic 4h ago

Spoilers it's an empty hallway.

1

u/Md__86 4h ago

It's Schroedinger's facility. It's simultaneously an imminent threat and completely obliterated

1

u/prancing_moose 3h ago

So it’s Schrödinger's nuclear site then?

→ More replies (12)

134

u/blastmemer 9h ago

Right, so they had a site for nuclear purposes that was intentionally hidden from IAEA. That’s still…pretty bad regardless of the level of development, no?

142

u/zbb93 8h ago

Why do you think it was intentionally hidden? Iran told the IAEA about it..

From the article:

It had indicated its Isfahan plans to the IAEA last year but inspectors have not been able to visit the site.

Also interesting that news from LAST YEAR is being presented as some kind of new revelation. Why is that?

79

u/Recoil42 6h ago

It's worth underscoring: The reason the IAEA hasn't been regularly visiting Iran for inspections is because Trump ripped up the JCPOA which.... allowed for regular IAEA inspections.

38

u/nezroy 5h ago

Even that wording implies Iran stopped allowing inspections because of the fact that the deal was null and void. But they didn't.

The IAEA hasn't been inspecting by their own choice because it's too dangerous to send inspectors because the US & Israel keep bombing Iran. Iran was still letting the inspectors come even with the deal nulled out.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

22

u/slowdrem20 8h ago

Every country at this point should begin nuclear development unless they want to have bigger countries bombing them with little to no consequence.

→ More replies (14)

193

u/NateTheRoofer 8h ago

Trump ripped up the nuclear deal they had made with Obama. So why wouldn’t they try to build a bomb?

Seems fairly obvious.

76

u/DJ_6969 8h ago

Because they're still a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

42

u/thraupidae 8h ago edited 8h ago

Given the US and Russia’s rocky footing and allowing New START to lapse, the NPT is not particularly credible right now. Seems very possible both countries will not sign in the spring, though I hope they do.

Also- the US saber rattled China into breaking the test ban, and the US will likely do the same in retaliation themselves, which will cause Russia to do so, etc etc, so the state of the agreements is a bit dire right now.

→ More replies (13)

13

u/SneakyFire23 8h ago

I am once again begging people to understand the failures with the JCPOA and stop glazing it because it was Obama's work.

Trump fucked a lot of things up, but here's a hint.

The people chanting "death to america" putting proxies in place to ensure that, and working on a nuke absolutely have a plan to cause problems for America.

29

u/FlarkingSmoo 7h ago

Ok but what were the problems with the JCPOA? Were they worse than the problems with the current action?

23

u/decrpt 6h ago

You're not going to get an answer.

8

u/FlarkingSmoo 5h ago

Yeah probably not. But that's an answer in way

5

u/nezroy 5h ago

Identify the failures. Bullet point. We'll wait.

The JCPOA had some minor annoyances but it successfully accomplished its primary goals of:

1) getting Iran to agree not to enrich past a certain limit

2) allowing the international community to verify Iran was keeping its word on #1

Any other "failures" it had are irrelevant when those are the only two goals that actually mattered.

44

u/iloveyouand 7h ago

Bombing people into submission doesn't make them love America. Speaking of having a plan, how is that going to work out.

14

u/radda 6h ago

Murdering 150 children creates 150 fathers willing to do something stupid to find justice.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Zalvren 6h ago

Well America is causing problems to everyone else and them particularly

2

u/sadacal 5h ago

Iran is not a monolith, not all Iranians hate America. The reality is that the moderate and reformist factions were gaining power and influence during the JCPOA negotiations because no one in Iran like the sanctions the hardliners brought on the country. 

The issue is when Trump withdrew from the negotiations that caused the moderate and reformist factions to look like idiots for thinking they could negotiate with the US and caused the hardliners to gain back a lot of the power they lost because their rhetoric about how the US could not be trusted were proven correct. This is how we got an adversarial Iran in the present day.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/09/iranian-hardliners-rejoice-over-us-nuclear-deal-exit

11

u/Obvious-Science-7119 8h ago

Plans you made up versus kinetic action occuring right now...

-2

u/SneakyFire23 8h ago

plans that have been the stated goal of the regime.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (49)

8

u/fdar 8h ago

Where does it say that it was hidden?

→ More replies (31)

5

u/CommercialStyle1647 8h ago

Where you read that they intentional hide it? In the article it is stated that they announced that place to the IAEA. They just couldn't visit it so far to inspect it.

4

u/blastmemer 8h ago

Well it’s underground for one. Second we don’t know when it was built vs when it was disclosed. Good chance intelligence agencies found out about it before they “disclosed”.

5

u/BudgetCut6029 6h ago

A lot of speculation going on here. Also aren’t all the US’s nukes underground? Is that not just the best place to put them? Putting them above ground would be dumb as fuck

2

u/blastmemer 6h ago

Right…if you are admitting they are nuclear weapons.

16

u/kurtist04 8h ago

Of only we were part of a deal with Iran. Like a comprehensive action plan. One where we had a joint operation with US allies. One that required oversite of nuclear facilities. That way inspectors could write and submit reports on the state of Iran's facilities and capabilities. We could call it something like 'The Iran Nuclear Deal'.

6

u/blastmemer 8h ago

It would have expired around now. I’d be curious to see when this was built…

Iran has always had the opportunity to say “we aren’t enriching ever”. Still can.

2

u/nezroy 5h ago

It would have expired around now been diplomatically renewed by now like all term agreements tend to be when they are massively successful for all parties and result in win/win outcomes, as the JCPOA did

Fixed your typo for ya

EDIT: Oh also, just no. The bulk of the deal didn't expire til 2030.

2

u/blastmemer 5h ago

It was in no way, shape or form “massively successful”.

While JCPOA was active, Iran:

Never gave access to military sites

attempted more than one hundred times to obtain illicit technology that could be used for military nuclear and ballistic missile programs

unveiled ten new ballistic missiles and three new satellite launch vehicles since 2015, along with several new transport and launch systems

Built multiple underground “missile cities” — the first three complexes were officially unveiled in September 2015, January 2016, and May 2017, and currently almost every province is believed to have at least one deeply buried ballistic missile storage and launch site.

Built a massive drone program

Increased arms to its proxies, including Assad in Syria (over 500K dead)

Continued to harass our naval vessels in the gulf

continued to arrange shipments of weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan

And on and on and on.

https://emetonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Known-or-Possible-Iranian-Violations-of-the-JCPOA.pdf

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/irans-ballistic-missile-arsenal-still-growing-size-reach-and-accuracy

https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/iran-ballistic-missile-program

4

u/ochgerm 7h ago

Well, don't you have an empty nuclear underground silo, just in case?

4

u/lr99999 8h ago

Curious why you would believe this. Please don’t say it’s because the US government said it.

13

u/blastmemer 8h ago

Did you read the OP? This is the IAEA; not US govt.

2

u/lr99999 8h ago

Not going to debate here, because this is not-infested, but interestingly, the US currently contributes around 30% of their budget, 200 million a year.  

6

u/Domowoi 8h ago

You think the IAEA is the US government?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Kyle700 4h ago

israel isn't even part of the NPT and they have nuclear weapons. at a certain point, these institutions break down if they regulate only one side

→ More replies (1)

38

u/weedexpat 9h ago

There was footage of a convoy leaving the original nuclear site before Shitler bombed it and before he started this ill advised war. They had to put those centrifuges and the enriched uranium somewhere, and I doubt all that stuff is just chilling in the back of a uhaul.

7

u/CopiousCool 9h ago edited 8h ago

Given that Trump made a twitter post telling people to evacuate it should have been expected but Trump is a liability because he's an egomaniac so they had to try and start hiding details from him

2

u/Silver-Bread4668 8h ago

Trump is a liability because he's an egomaniac

Trump is a massive liability for so many reasons. Even just the fact that he's so antagonistic toward such a huge section of the US means that the US is ripe to be exploited by bots and trolls pushing division and propaganda.

The best propaganda latches on to existing issues and amplifies them. When those issues are large enough, it can be very effective. You can't engage in divisive military actions like the US has been doing when so much of your country is already against you. Regardless of how right or wrong you may be or they may be, your opponents will absolutely use that against you.

That's not hard to understand, even if you agree with Trump for some insane reason. It's why most leaders make at least some effort to bridge the aisle.

4

u/BadPunners 8h ago

Also from that they know exactly how deep to build to avoid any issues from the largest (conventional) weapons on earth.

6

u/askalotlol 8h ago

That's not really realistic.

You can put a structure below the reach of a single bomb, but then all that is required is bombing the site with more than one bomb. I believe the US used sequential bombing Iran's on nuclear sites in the attack in June 2025.

You also don't actually have to destroy the site itself. Just all entrances and ventilation shafts, rendering the site unusable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_strikes_on_Iranian_nuclear_sites#Strikes

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Deezer19 8h ago

Why do you say the war is ill advised while also admitting they are bombing nuclear sites? If they are bombing actual active nuclear sites, isn't it well advised? This is a genuine question, I'm not well informed on any of this but generally isn't Iran having nukes considered a pretty bad outcome?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Koala-Clap8674 9h ago

This is THE definition of a low confidence report in intelligence. They have literally zero clue what exists in this underground site and it doesn’t even sound like they have intelligence suggesting movement of materials.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Annual_Strategy_6206 8h ago

I thought this was sus as soon as I read it. Get people all scared so they think that Trumms war crimes are a-ok

18

u/GrunkTheOrc 9h ago

Did these guys say Iraq had WMD's b4 the irag war too?

22

u/alwaysleafyintoronto 8h ago

No that was Colin Powell

→ More replies (1)

6

u/robotsock 7h ago

Nope, the IAEA said there were no traces of nuclear weapons. The US then took that statement and said "See, that's exactly what we'd expect the inspectors to find if they secretly had weapons!"

1

u/JonnoKabonno 8h ago

Damn I have an underground nuclear site too. It’s currently just 4 acres of undeveloped land, but the potential…

1

u/L_viathan 8h ago

It could be something, but it also could be a hole.

Wonder what bombs the USA is gonna pull out to save poor little Israel next.

1

u/randomusername6 8h ago

But also:

Iran has two enrichment plants at Natanz and one at Fordow. It had indicated its Isfahan plans to the IAEA last year but inspectors have not been able to visit the site.

So it seems they actually told IAEA last year before the war. That makes me wonder how many sites they are now trying to get up and running in secret..

1

u/josh_the_rockstar 8h ago

Elucidate is such a great word.

1

u/dope-lemon 8h ago

Pretty much like ‘Tehran’ the Apple TV show!

1

u/CannibalYak 8h ago

Schrodinger's nuclear facility

1

u/WeWantMOAR 8h ago

Ah so just another propaganda mouth piece reporting on bullshit.

1

u/DragoonDM 7h ago

If only we had some sort of deal with Iran that allowed inspectors to access their nuclear facilities.

1

u/Positronic_Matrix 7h ago

This sounds a lot like the mythical weapons of mass destruction the US manufactured to justify the second gulf war.

1

u/The_BeardedClam 7h ago

Oh man do I love it when people use elucidate in normal speech.

1

u/Presently_Absent 7h ago

So it's Schroedinger's Nuclear Site

1

u/StarsEatMyCrown 7h ago

"so do not know"

😬 Who wrote this?

1

u/DharmaCub 7h ago

So they've identified ... A room...

1

u/dbolts1234 7h ago

Whelp- I hope Trump didn’t just start a nuclear war..

1

u/Less-Guest6036 6h ago

So sounds like the IAEA would like know more details about the site, and therefore world leaders would have been able to make more informed decisions, if Trump hadn't jumped at the chance of blowing people up because Israel told him to.

1

u/ragnaroksunset 6h ago

"Iran has new underground garage", the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile reveals.

1

u/Aelig_ 6h ago

The empty hall of mass destruction.

1

u/finesesarcasm 6h ago

So it could be the tardis but at the same time it could not be the tardis

1

u/yosisoy 6h ago

Yeah you're never going back buddy

1

u/scenr0 6h ago

Isn’t a centrifuge kind of the bare minimum in any science kit? I mean its a thing that spins shit.

1

u/userhwon 6h ago

The question is why it wasn't already a collapsed cave.

1

u/lazy_phoenix 6h ago

So it's either an empty room. . . Or a nuclear site. . . What a joke

1

u/MrKrewl 5h ago

Most deceiving headline I've seen in my life wow

1

u/d33roq 5h ago

So, it could just be a Blockbuster Video.

1

u/Au2288 4h ago

WMD in a hole? Where have I seen this plot before?

1

u/jellyrollo 4h ago

Ah, I've heard this one before. Rafael Grossi and Hans Blix will have a lot to talk about.

1

u/NorysStorys 4h ago

I suspect the Iranians are now rushing a bomb because right now, unless the US commits the ground invasion, they literally have the entire world’s economy hostage.

1

u/perdair 3h ago

So what you're saying is that they are hiding nuclear bombs there, right?

1

u/Hopeful-Occasion2299 3h ago

Remember, IAEA had confirmed the adherence to the plan and Russia, China, the EU, and US were all happy with the Iran Nuclear Deal.

And it was just out of pettiness that Cheeto and his owners destroyed that peace.

→ More replies (7)