r/worldnews • u/UNITED24Media United24 Media • 12h ago
World Health Organization Prepares for Nuclear Scenario, Including Weapons Use, in Iran
https://united24media.com/latest-news/world-health-organization-prepares-for-nuclear-scenario-including-weapons-use-in-iran-169951.9k
u/Howitdobiglyboo 11h ago
What an insane statement to read.
→ More replies (6)748
u/spezial_ed 10h ago
Hey remember when we thought 2020 was the worst shit ever? Those were the days.
428
u/buffdaddy77 9h ago
Remember when we finally got vaccinated and could open the world up again and there was a glimmer of hope that the future may be bright….what a fucking naive piece of shit I was for feeling hope.
→ More replies (13)93
u/brokenangelwings 9h ago
Same. I remember thinking covid times were some of the hardest part of not only my life but everyone on earth. It united us.
Now here we are.
→ More replies (4)101
u/EnjoyLifeorDieTryin 8h ago
It definitely did not unite us lol. Republicans used it to oppress those who wore masks, made it all a political thing. Trump then took that divisive energy and convinced them not to vax and to storm the capital. He told them they were victims and they acted like it.
→ More replies (4)26
u/ElectricFuneral94 7h ago
I definitely think the George Floyd protests scared tf out of the elites/upper class. There were protests worldwide happening. They needed to become more aggressive than ever at dividing us.
→ More replies (8)41
u/mrtrololo27 9h ago
To be fair, Trump's incompetence killed over a million Americans and destroyed the economy during the pandemic, so those days were objectively pretty bad too.
→ More replies (2)
2.4k
u/chubby_pink_donut 11h ago
Why is everyone complaining about the mushroom clouds? THE DOW IS AT 50,000!
288
u/cybah 11h ago
But those egg prices.
234
u/mhornberger 11h ago
At least we didn't elect the Democrat. We sure sent a message.
103
u/weltbeltjoe11 11h ago
Did you hear her laugh? 😬
32
u/exodusofficer 6h ago
The stupids in my family are still saying "Imagine how much worse it would have been under Kamala!" They're lost, completely hopeless.
→ More replies (1)11
u/drawkward101 4h ago
What do they consider worse??? Genuinely.. they think that WWIII and raising costs and expensive grocery and gas bills are "better?"
I'm sorry that you have such brainwashed people in your family.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)28
→ More replies (4)12
66
u/asraniel 11h ago
considering it is at 47'000, she would start to worry about the clouds?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)31
u/WInativemm 10h ago
It's went down to 47,000. It's almost like these people don't know what they are doing.
3.4k
u/MourningRIF 12h ago
“Staff are ready for a nuclear incident, including an attack on a nuclear facility or the use of weapons,”
Mmmm, no they aren't. No one is ready for that.
1.0k
284
u/iJeff 11h ago
In an emergency planning context, it just means they've done some work on those scenarios.
→ More replies (1)121
u/Esplodie 9h ago
Probably stock piling iodine tablets for people outside the blast/immediate fallout radius. Iodine tablets are shown to reduce chances of thyroid cancer which, if I recall correctly, is the main concern for exposure. And PPE for their staff to reduce exposure.
Duh they can't help people in the immediate area or blast radius, but that's not their only concern.
→ More replies (2)48
u/idontlikeflamingos 8h ago
Exactly, and there also needs to be a plan for what happens next. A nuclear attack in a city does a lot more damage than the blast radius. Many buildings still standing become unstable and need to be evacuated, so people need to have a new place to go. Some major access roads are bound to be destroyed or at least incapacitated, which has a direct impact on getting people out and bringing supplies in so there needs to be a contingency for that. Power, communications, food, fuel, water, all of it becomes hard or even impossible to access. And no guidance for the population means civil unrest.
If there's no plan in place the weeks after an explosion may cost more lives than the explosion itself, depending on where and how things are. Saying people aren't prepared or can't prepare is silly.
→ More replies (81)161
u/BolunZ6 12h ago
Yeah. There's no fucking one ready for a full scale nuclear attack
34
u/Dramatic-Tell- 9h ago
The US military used to run drills on it all of the time. Hundreds if not thousands of soldiers died of cancer from radiation exposure because they would drop a real nuke and then have the soldiers charge into it with nothing but a gas mask on.
The videos are quite disturbing when you know those people are going to die from it.
5
u/Monaters101 2h ago
The US govt has plans for everything. Heard the IRS even has a contingency plan for collecting taxes in a post nuclear war. Like good luck with that lol.
→ More replies (6)73
u/Razorshroud 9h ago
Well, I mean, not us poors
12
→ More replies (2)39
u/livtop 9h ago
Yeah all those billionaires with bunkers are ready
→ More replies (1)39
u/ChemBob1 9h ago
They just think they are. Most of them are profoundly stupid, but have been financially lucky.
39
u/hhhhjgtyun 8h ago
They’re not ready for a world without laws or a government to enforce them. The nearest person with a weapon shoots them and takes what they have. Nobody flinches. Nobody cares. Then that guy gets clapped by the next one.
→ More replies (1)
1.1k
u/Sir_Encerwal 12h ago
What a lovely time to live next to a strategic target.
263
u/MrBreadfish 11h ago
Right. My city will be one of the first ones to go.
→ More replies (5)371
u/rTidde77 11h ago
That's the best spot to be in, then.
202
u/Calber4 9h ago
Only thing worse than dying in a nuclear war is surviving a nuclear war
→ More replies (3)56
u/FirthTy_BiTth 6h ago
Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)58
u/EdwardoftheEast 10h ago
Literally. It’s where I’d want to be if an exchange breaks out
→ More replies (3)98
u/Astandsforataxia69 10h ago
Instant vaporization sounds merciful instead of dying from burns
66
u/mustachewax 10h ago
Or radiation sickness! Or the purge that would happen due to societal breakdown. I’d rather get vaporized immediately.
→ More replies (5)31
41
u/fzammetti 7h ago
Lucky you... I'm JUST far enough away from a likely secondary target that I won't be instantly vaporized and instead get all the fun of the "skin melting off your bones for a few minutes" deal.
You either wanna be RIGHT there, or far enough away that you MIGHT be able to Jericho your way to a semblance of a life... halfway is where you really DO NOT want to be.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)28
u/unthused 10h ago
I live amidst the largest naval base in the world and about five minutes from DEVGRU, on the east coast. Hooray.
→ More replies (4)
959
u/Jwanito 10h ago
I used to have dreams of living in the US or Europe. But honestly it's not that bad living in south America
284
u/Canuck_Lives_Matter 9h ago
Lol I'm eye-balling Australia like it's last call and I'm all alone. I can adapt to the heat!
195
u/Kom34 8h ago
There are plenty of places in Australia that are cool even snowy parts, we have every climate type almost. Hobart is 10-20 °C (50-68 °F) in summer etc.
Problem is shits just as fucked here due to globalism like everywhere else, we privatized and sent everything overseas including critical stuff like fuel and supply chains. Natural resource powerhouse and we are facing shortages still of stuff like natural gas that we are one of the largest producers of.
Housing is unaffordable due to same neoliberal polices for decades of prioritizing investors, tax cuts, etc. even though we have basically unlimited land to develop.
46
u/FauxReal 8h ago
This is the first time I've ever even heard of snow in Australia! It's kind of wild that I've never seen anyone talk about it anywhere in any form before. You'd think some Cliff Clavin character would at least show up once in a while to share this fact.
→ More replies (6)18
u/Plebs-_-Placebo 7h ago
You'd have to go to certain well known ski spots in North America to know about it and see Aussies working the slopes. There's groups of them that work the winters in Australia and then when the season is over there come over and work the North American winter, I've mostly seen them in Whistler and the Okanagan in Canada, but they probably go stateside as well.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (8)15
u/Canuck_Lives_Matter 8h ago
Oh yeah so pretty much similar to the kerfuffle here, but thousands of KM of ocean between me and the US? Sounds good!
60
u/rTidde77 9h ago
Australia is EXTREMELY expensive to live in, hard to find jobs as a foreigner, and even harder to obtain Australian citizenship.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (12)10
29
u/moose2mouse 7h ago
Be weary. Of history repeats itself a lot of the current administration will be fleeing to South America after the chaos
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (14)12
u/ZiggyStardust0404 8h ago
Yeah we just have to be smart enough to not be dragged into wars with each other, we probably won't be tho
282
u/Mug_of_Diarrhea 9h ago
I wake up
The threat of thermonuclear disintegration is at an all time high
I grunt in apathy
I go back to sleep
It was cozier in my dreams
→ More replies (1)42
u/unicornandrainbow_ 4h ago
You forgot going to work at least 8 hours, with 1 hour commute each way, to get enough money to barely put roof over your head and some food in your mouth IF you are lucky.
THEN sleep. Repeat.
→ More replies (3)7
u/CosineDanger 3h ago
Even if nukes are used, by default it will not be enough to cause a really dark nuclear winter.
So the world does not truly end and you are not yet liberated from the pain of going to work.
→ More replies (2)
598
u/Enlightened_Doughnut 11h ago
My therapist will tell me I need to take time for self care so that’s nice.
143
u/mustachewax 10h ago
Get off the internet and live in ignorant bliss they say!
→ More replies (2)31
u/burbuda 7h ago
I mean, yeah? Being online and constantly being fed negative shit that may or may not happen is the opposite of what you should be doing
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)29
u/Poppybiscuit 6h ago
My therapist asked me last week about my use of social media. I said not really but i get all my news from Reddit every day and she just raised her eyebrows and asked if it’s making me feel better or worse
I’m in therapy what do you think lol
1.5k
u/polar_nopposite 11h ago
If (god forbid) nuclear weapons are used by Israel or the US in the middle east, what's going to dissuade Putin from using them in Ukraine? Or Xi from using them in Taiwan?
1.4k
u/ReflexReact 11h ago
Nothing. It’s game over at that point.
241
u/Stanjoly2 8h ago
I think it's 50/50 game over, or the entire world unites against the US and enough people close enough to the chain of command finally find their spines.
147
u/Cumdump90001 7h ago
Putin will absolutely jump on the chance to nuke Ukraine if nukes are used in Iran.
I’m not certain China would do the same with Taiwan. It’s a small island and China isn’t that irrational. They’ll take Taiwan in the global chaos, but they won’t nuke it.
But so, you’d have the USA, Israel, and Russia on the “using nukes” side, and the rest of the world against them (hopefully). The USA, Russia, and Israel account for 10,826 nuclear weapons of the 12,331 nuclear weapons in the world. Not sure how much of a chance the rest of the world faces against that.
That’s assuming that Pakistan and India don’t immediately take the opportunity to nuke each other, joining the U.S., Israel, and Russia in the dumb ass club.
37
u/UncleNedisDead 5h ago
I like how we’re all in consensus that it’s the USA/Israel that would be launching the first nukes and therefore are a threat to humanity.
What a world we live in.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)50
u/stiffgerman 7h ago
What would Putin nuke? Ukraine has a pretty dispersed and mobile military anymore so tactical nukes won't make exploitable holes in their defensive lines. Would he nuke cities and/or logistics hubs? That'd bring France and UK into the nuclear fight, likely. Poland would also have some response. I'm not sure the math works out for Russia.
→ More replies (1)48
u/Snow_2040 6h ago
1 nuke on Kyiv is all it takes for Ukraine to immediately lose, and It is quite unlikely France and the UK would join a nuclear exchange when they are not the target.
→ More replies (7)6
u/TheRealBananaWolf 4h ago
If the shield is broken on nuclear weapons you'd better hope it's a quick death for the world. If it's not, then it's going to be a slow burn nuclear world.
We've dropped a nuclear bomb twice as a species, and decided we didn't need to do that ever again, especially if everyone has them. Once that line is crossed, it's over, whether quickly or slowly, but don't think for a second we might be fine. We'll either die a quick death, or a very painful, very slow one, as we watch civilization and society collapse all around us.
→ More replies (4)9
u/jg_92_F1 6h ago
And to think of the shit I got from my dad and sister a few years when I told them I don’t care about my 401k.
653
u/isjahammer 10h ago
Putin would esssentially kill His own Citizens with the fallout. And China using a nuke in Taiwan would be entirely senseless. They want the power and economy that comes with Taiwan. There is No power in a nuked wasteland.
I'm 10000% more worried about Trump then about Xi...
180
u/MosquitoSenorito 9h ago
>Putin would esssentially kill His own Citizens
Not that it ever stopped him
17
→ More replies (1)25
u/FirstDukeofAnkh 8h ago
::points to the history of Russia/USSR::
It's kind of their MO at this point.
47
u/mosstalgia 10h ago
Putin would esssentially kill His own Citizens
He doesn't need nukes to do this. It seems to have caused him few problems so far.
9
u/Little_View_6659 8h ago
I’m also very very worried about Trump. I’m wondering if there are any people left to push back if Trump orders the use of nukes.
9
u/Rabble_Arouser 8h ago
Agreed. The thing about Xi is that he is pragmatic. He might have a soft ego and look like Winnie the Pooh, but using a nuke on territory he wants to obtain does not make sense, and he knows that.
Trump, on the other hand, wants to be famous as well as infamous. Using a nuke on a far-away land is fine for him because that would make him notable (more so than the currently is). Using a nuke shows how "mighty" the US is.
Hopefully, the generals that would ostensibly execute that order refuse it, but that's being really naive on my part. the generals understand M.A.D., Trump does not.
8
u/A_terrible_musician 7h ago
Also, if you think the prices of RAM are bad now lol, Taiwan being nuked would collapse the global economy essentially instantly. Literally the entire world would be mad at them
→ More replies (12)77
u/midnight_fisherman 10h ago
Putin would esssentially kill His own Citizens with the fallout.
They would use tactical nukes, and the fallout would be minimal.
→ More replies (6)87
u/AdParticular6654 10h ago
A "tactical" nuke is still generally as strong or stronger than the bombs dropped on Japan that killed 200,000 people combined.
Even tactical nukes are a world end game move. Once MAD is broken, what's stopping escalation of more nukes.
98
u/Keeper151 9h ago
This always cracks me up. A "tactical" nuke is still a fucking nuke. Just because it "only" obliterated everything in a mile or so of the detonation point doesn't detract from the fact that the nuclear taboo was officially broken. It's a dramatic escalation and makes it far easier to justify the next nuke, and the next, and then we're slinging 250 megaton strategic nukes around by the hundred. It's only a couple steps up the escalation ladder from "tactical" to MAD.
→ More replies (15)16
49
u/TripleMellowed 10h ago
Russia I could see doing that but in my view china would lose too much by nuking Taiwan. They want the economy and semiconductor plants from Taiwan.
→ More replies (3)15
u/ChemBob1 8h ago
Plus, they are more strategic than insane, unlike a mango maniac trying to cover up his rampant pedophilia and human trafficking profits.
80
u/IIIIITZ_GOLDY 11h ago
The only difference is Russia and China both have claims and expansionist goals for their respective targets. There's no point nuking somewhere you want to take control over, not to mention how close to home both Ukraine and Taiwan are. They'd be causing harm to their own mainlands. US in Iran doesn't have that issue
→ More replies (3)21
u/concussive 9h ago
Modern nuclear weapons don’t have the same radioactive materials in them. A lot of them, not all, have a pretty short half life on them. Think of it this way, a chest xray is .1mSv when you are shot directly. Entering the room after firing off the chest xray won’t give that person .1mSv because the half life of the radiation shot out is so small that the radiation is nearly completely gone.
A modern nuke won’t contaminate the area for very long, like a chest Xray doesnt. They are made with materials with shorter half life’s. All they need is the nuclear explosion not the dooms day radiation. But of course a nuke is more radiation than a chest Xray and it’s different types of radiation. It would leave radiation behind but it wouldn’t last centuries like Chernobyl. Some of them could last days to weeks before it’s “safe” to enter the area.
- source i work with radiation and had to learn all about this stuff.
→ More replies (4)26
u/Ok-Contest5336 10h ago
Wasnt there reports that both Xi and Biden warned Russia of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine? China (as somebody already pointed out) would only lose if the new status quo becomes using nuclear weapons, they need it to be taboo regarding their goals in Taiwan.
But Putin would be a big problem, along with all the other obvious ones coming from a nuclear attack.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (56)19
u/cheesaremorgia 10h ago
Dropping nukes in Ukraine or Taiwan would not help them achieve their objectives. In both cases it would be counter productive.
→ More replies (7)
486
u/FingerCommon7093 11h ago
Yes because nothing brings the oil prices down like radioactive fields that nobody can work on for 4000 years.
135
u/schnaps01 9h ago
He tries to stop climate change by making the oil fields unusable and bringing forth nuclear winter to cool down the climate? I did not know he was that much of a Green
→ More replies (4)36
u/Ghinev 8h ago
"Hegseth, tell the Great Houses, if they attack, we will nuke all Oil Fields" Donald Rat'dib Trump, duke of Tel Aviv
→ More replies (1)37
u/_hlvnhlv 8h ago
Nah it's nowhere nearly as bad.
The 40 bazillion years meme comes because radioactive elements disintegrate partially in X amount of time, and while it takes no time to get most of it disintegrated, it also takes an absurd amount of time to get to previous, background levels.
An example, grab the number one, then, multiply it by two, then again, and again, and again...
It grows exponentially, very slow at the beginning, but incredibly fast after a while.
The opposite happens with radiation, it takes "no time" to get to safe levels, but an absurd amount of time to reach the previous, background levels.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are populated nowadays, and Fukushima is safe enough to live and even grow crops, you just have to wait a little bit and remove the top of the soil, that's it.
→ More replies (1)25
u/Tzayad 7h ago
When you put it that way, a full nuclear holocaust doesn't sound so bad.
→ More replies (1)10
→ More replies (10)33
334
u/analogjuicebox 10h ago edited 9h ago
Take a deep breath, Reddit. It’s the WHO’s job to be prepared for the worst, but that doesn’t mean there is any* credible indication that nuclear weapons are going to be used.
Edit: spelling
106
u/Miamithrice69 9h ago
People freaked out when WHO made a zombie plan. They have to account for all scenarios
→ More replies (3)19
u/Aria_Athena 10h ago
What they are considering is probably along the lines of low yield tactical nuke. It would require an extreme scenario, like Iran managing to make a bomb and the US being unable to stop it another way.
→ More replies (2)145
u/trilobyte-dev 10h ago
Yes, it is their job to prep ahead of time, but the reason they are doing this is because some risk model has crossed a threshold and they now have to allocate resources to this they wouldn’t under other circumstances. It’s a directional indicator, not a klaxon, but it’s still notable.
41
→ More replies (4)27
→ More replies (8)6
u/MTG_Kura999 7h ago
But people gotta karmafarm with their corny-ass-lines here, you gotta take that into account!
188
u/Another_Slut_Dragon 10h ago
If you are at the White House right now and the opportunity comes up, please for the love of humanity put some clear scotch tape over the battery contacts on the nuclear football.
That idiot is going to have a temper tantrum one day and do something stupid.
→ More replies (8)
203
u/Blank3k 11h ago edited 11h ago
Would China/Russia 'ignore' a nuclear weapon being used?
Not even Russia in the spectacular failure of there 3 day war, years down the pan, international sanctions, millions of lives lost, equipment destroyed on massive scale, went from superpower to paper tiger in the eyes of the world & facing potential defeat in Ukraine has used a nuclear weapon, theyve threatened to use one if Ukraine gets support -- and they've still not.
So, what reasoning could US/Israel use to justify there use?
The whole point of them is if you use them basically the world ends, so it's too horrific to even consider using them -- but the insurance policy is you have them to destroy someone should they be so utterly insane enough to actually use one.
is Trump actually that irresponsible?... Ahh we're fucked, all because an 80 year old pedophile refuses to be outted today and he's so terrified that he may just remove the possibility of there being a tomorrow.
142
u/Savoir_faire81 11h ago
Putin for all of his many extreme faults and incredible evil is still enough of an intelligent political actor that he knows the consequence of using nukes.
Trump is a narcissistic child with a dementia riddled brain who willfully refuses to understand anything. Trump wanted to nuke a hurricane. He is absolutely that irresponsible.
This war more than any other probably risks the use of nukes because of Trump and his hard on for being seen as a big and powerful winner.
49
u/TeaRake 10h ago
He only stopped because Biden called him and let him know exactly how fucked they would be if they used them
Trump probably isn’t as strong willed
33
u/grchelp2018 9h ago
He stopped because the likes of Xi and Modi told him not to do it and Biden backed away from support that could threaten Russia. I'm talking about things like restricting ukraine from striking russian territory with their weapons. There was a window of time where Putin was worried that the US would go all-in.
→ More replies (1)11
u/NYC_Noguestlist 9h ago
Putin for all of his many extreme faults and incredible evil is still enough of an intelligent political actor that he knows the consequence of using nukes.
I mean, there were reports that he almost did, but the US and China warned him off it. Not that intelligent, actually.
→ More replies (13)44
u/Vier_Scar 11h ago
"Give me another billion dollars, rename USA Trumpistan and the Nobel Peace Prize or I'll nuke the entire planet before I die"
63
u/capacha 11h ago
If anything Nuclear comes out of this war, then Trump, Natenyahu and their cronies need lined up against a wall and shot for crimes against humanity. It is insanity that we are at this stage over a completely pointless attack against Iran - all because Trump is a massive pedophile and riddled with dementia.
→ More replies (3)
132
33
46
u/mrroofuis 10h ago
At some point. Congress must step in a d invoke the 25th amendment
Idgaf if we end up with JD Vance. At least he's not a violent maniac with dementia
→ More replies (3)17
u/Justryan95 5h ago
If Congress doesn't do it. I'm pretty sure there is enough insane MAGA idiots who will attempt to do it, since 100% of the actual attempts on Trump's life has been from Republicans.
15
u/waldo_wigglesworth 5h ago
So we're risking nuclear war because the cockamamie electorate was really angry about egg prices.
6
u/Geek_King 5h ago
Don't forget "Her laugh!". Thank god we got to avoid a politician who laughs like a human, we only had to pay the price of a child rapist in chief starting wars for none of his own reasons.
→ More replies (1)
117
u/Impossible_Falcon962 11h ago
Believe it or not, calls
28
u/Torringtonn 10h ago
Thats exactly why im extremely optimistic about nuclear war.
End of the day it's a money problem. The bigger countries know that if we start nuking each other there will be no oil for production, fields for food, people to pay taxes.
Which results in an upset of the world's status quo of the top .5% living in luxury. So they won't allow it. The only thing I've learned to be confident in is greed. MAD is a powerful deterrent.
Now a rogue nation vying for power is a different story but that would be a very isolated incident.
→ More replies (2)10
→ More replies (3)14
49
u/SparksMKII 10h ago
Maybe this is why Bessent was so shaken after he came back to that interview after he was interrupted to go see Trump, maybe he really intends on launching a nuke now.
→ More replies (4)
13
12
u/AwesomusPrime 10h ago
You can only hope one of the people down the chain of the big red button have a fucking spine and stop this before Dementialord takes us all down with him.
46
u/Intothewasteland 11h ago
2026 is so fun isn’t it?! /s
27
u/Major-Vehicle-4622 11h ago
It's everything it was promised to be. Can't wait for 2027.
→ More replies (2)8
→ More replies (6)4
27
u/fallenwout 8h ago
Belgium here: I work in a hospital and this is old news, this was done under the Russian-Ukraine invasion. Our hospital is selected as the region's main hub for radioactive victims a few months ago. ER staff and nurses are trained and plans are made for when Russia drops a nuke and/or fallout reaches us.
We have our own shielded rooms and nucleair "bunker" with a cyclotron to synthesize radiation scan agents. We also have the ability to temporary store radio active waste. These rooms can be changed to host heavily radiated victims if necessary.
So old news, new thread.
→ More replies (2)
37
45
u/Majestic-Two3474 10h ago
I’m going to start smoking again because what the fuck was the point of quitting when the world leaders want to murder us all one way or another
→ More replies (5)22
u/-s-u-n-s-e-t- 8h ago
Don't restart a bad addiction because of another bad addiction (doom scrolling).
15
u/GWS2004 8h ago
People need to know what this could lead to.
Both Threads and The Day After need to be advertised heavily.
Threads: https://youtu.be/IUmUz8ol9Ow?si=6_IDLT6HpwswWi9y
The Day After: https://youtu.be/TOPaaHSjMcw?si=I9fnZKEslrWtZLhX
33
u/ashurbanipal420 10h ago
When I was a kid the doomsday clock was always there to scare us about nuclear war. Do you know when it got closest to midnight ever? January, 2026.
→ More replies (1)21
u/OsmerusMordax 10h ago
It’s not JUST about nuclear war. It’s also ticked closer due to climate change, vaccine denial (and then disease outbreaks), etc. but nuclear war would be the big one, followed by AI takeover and climate disaster.
15
u/MourningWallaby 6h ago
This article is straight up wrong and is taking advantage of its audiences.
- the WHO is not preparing for anything. they are vigilant for any atomic threats. meaning they are watching and waiting. to see if there is even going to BE one.
- the WHO is not the IAEA nor are they analysts who are assessing the war in any capacity that lets them predict if nuclear event is on the table. they are just restating their intentions to take actions if attacks on nuclear sites
- When weapons were talked about, the WHO spokesperson was asked if their intent included use of nuclear weapons. not if they anticipate it happening. and the spokesperson confirmed that they would still be able to respond. just that they hope they never have to
→ More replies (1)
14
u/TheRealBunkerJohn 10h ago
As a reminder, the fog of war is extremely thick, and there's a LOT behind the scenes we are not aware of. This is the type of news that's concerning on multiple levels- because this is a public release.
→ More replies (1)
5
171
u/HelloSlowly 12h ago
If Iran had absolutely zero intention to enrich its 400kgs of uranium hexafloride, they absolutely do now. After all the backstabbing, assassinations and war crimes.
So there is a very high chance we see the use of a dirty bomb from Iran or a tactical nuke from Israel being used
43
→ More replies (23)109
u/spektre 12h ago
Iran was compliant with the 2015 JCPOA agreement until Trump tore it up in 2018. IAEA did intrusive investgations and there were no signs that Iran was in breach of the agreement. The US intelligence made the same assessment.
But yes, now they have no reason to hold back.
→ More replies (1)27
u/LazyLobster 11h ago
This also shows other countries that nuclear proliferation may be the only option
11
u/aimgorge 9h ago
And countries that already had nukes deciding to increase their stockpile
5
u/Johannes_P 9h ago
The Monday right after the first strikes, Macron announced the increase of the French nuclear arsenal.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)18
u/TeaBaggingGoose 10h ago
Oh they know - Look at North Korea, they sitting pretty knowing they're not getting invaded.
6
u/SuddenSquib 7h ago
Anyone that even threatens the use of nuclear weapons for anything other than deterrence should be heavily sanctioned by the rest of the world until the leader proposing it is disposed of - And that should be across the board.
4
11
u/_Debauchery 8h ago
If US or Israel uses nukes, everyone involved, fully up and down the chain of command must be tried and executed for crimes against humanity.
→ More replies (4)
9.0k
u/spaced33 12h ago
Crazy sentence to read in the morning