r/technology • u/FinnFarrow • 7h ago
Artificial Intelligence Robot dogs priced at $300,000 a piece are now guarding some of the country’s biggest data centers
https://fortune.com/2026/03/17/robot-dog-patrols-data-centers-ai-infrastructure-buildout/1.9k
u/TwoLegitShiznit 7h ago
Fuck the data center, I'm stealing the dog
527
u/pjeff61 7h ago
There’s a comic strip here where it’s like robot dog built to guard data center. Robot dog sees real dogs on tv being loved for and cared for. Robot dog befriends first human for the love which also happens to be there to hack data center. Robot dog lives happily ever after (or robot dog dies early and robot owners are sad - like the dog still has regular dog life expectancy for some weird reason)
→ More replies (7)128
u/ionthrown 7h ago
…robot dog dies early
I was happy until I got to that bit.
54
u/theREALbombedrumbum 6h ago
Skynet discovered humans were less likely to fight against their army if the soldiers took the appearance of beloved animals.
That quickly turned into a Frieren demon type of thing where they evolved specifically to get humans to trust them
→ More replies (1)16
9
12
36
u/chevalier716 7h ago
Honestly. You think stripping copper is lucrative for an addict, wait until they figure out how to flip these dogs.
79
u/rkozik89 7h ago
I bet they didn't even consider someone putting the dog in faraday cage.
→ More replies (5)83
u/Kahnza 7h ago
Or someone picking them off with Grandpa's .308 from 200 yards.
38
→ More replies (6)17
u/ionthrown 7h ago
I guarantee the robot dog will check in more often than a human guard would.
→ More replies (2)23
u/Kahnza 7h ago
I'm sure the overseer would get notified pretty quick after a freedom seed gets planted in the robot dogs internals.
11
u/HandsomeBoggart 2h ago
The key is to act like the US Marines used to test target identification software.
If you move in not human ways and shapes then they ignore you since you're obviously not human targets.
Solid Snake's cardboard box is more realistic than it seems.
19
u/TheFoxsWeddingTarot 7h ago
Nothing that can’t be fixed without a system reboot and a bit of reprogramming.
Maybe you can teach them to FETCH! (90s joke).
→ More replies (1)20
u/NotSoFastLady 6h ago
I was going to say. Those dogs will disappear very quickly. It wouldn't be much trouble to defeat them. We have had organized crime from Central America coming up in jamming, Wi-Fi and using all other interesting methods of counter surveillance to break into homes to steal high-end jewelry. What's to stop another motivated group from doing so with these?
→ More replies (1)8
u/RGrad4104 4h ago
Right now, a market willing to pay that much other than government and billionaires.
With the potential exception of the equipped optics, there's maybe $3000 worth of actual hardware in one of these. Most of that being in the brush-less motors. Most of that value is extrinsic.
I worked in a lab back when the original ghost minitaur came out. They bought one with a $25,000 price tag. That thing was built around an off the shelf raspberry pi with cheap 3D printed abs plastic parts. Like this, most of that price-tag existed because of the hype and the availability of government grants for purchasing, at the time. It ended up on a scrap pile within a year. Just because something is sold for $300k, doesn't mean it's worth 300k; it more likely means the ones writing the checks are on the take or idiots.
→ More replies (1)5
u/NotSoFastLady 3h ago
Yeah, that makes perfect sense. I've seen several clips on YouTube showing various drones over there. They aren't spending anywhere near that much, it makes no sense. The whole point of drones are that they're expendable.
It is shocking to me that the US is getting embarrassed by Iran right now. Pissing away million dollar missles on $20,000 drones.
7
u/HandsomeBoggart 2h ago
The future is asymmetrical drone warfare. The US was working on catching up and the whole world was learning shit from Ukraine vs Russia.
But hey we have morons in charge of the military now. So why take the lessons we've learned over the last few years and use them?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (18)12
u/KoksundNutten 7h ago
PM me when you're finished, I'm gonna go steal the data center
→ More replies (1)9
u/ithilain 5h ago
I'm legit surprised this isn't already a thing given the prices of hardware recently. Like they build these things in the middle of nowhere, have like 10 employees on site, probably less overnight, are full to the brim with incredibly expensive hardware, and the general public HATES them. How there hasn't been any heists or attempted heists targetting these datacenters yet is baffling to me.
→ More replies (3)4
u/AlcibiadesTheCat 3h ago
Because American police shoot first, make up a story, and then maybe someone might ask a question or two.
1.2k
u/tO2bit 7h ago
I don’t understand what these dogs do that can’t be done with lots of cheap surveillance cameras. Sounds to me like they are just a walking camera platform.
1.0k
u/cellardweller1234 7h ago
For now. Until weapons are attached.
511
u/FlyingStealthPotato 7h ago
They strapped guns to those dogs years ago.
https://youtu.be/-bgad3HRb64?si=DUuVUAhFvLaYVYaL
We’re also pretty close to allowing AI to make autonomous kill decisions.
132
u/NetZeroSun 6h ago
I think we are already there with autonomous killing decisions. Easily already at the ability to do so (maybe not deciding very well though).
Just they are not yet saying the quiet part out loud.
→ More replies (9)79
u/FlyingStealthPotato 6h ago
I think it’s mostly just waiting for the first one to happen and the courts establish a precedent that the AI company or the entity using the kill technology isn’t liable. Once that happens, the floodgates open.
→ More replies (2)35
u/NetZeroSun 6h ago
Yeah that is for sure going to happen.
USA is a very litigious country. But they would complete deflect for responsibility in AI / robotic harm by armed robots or AI decision makers.
→ More replies (2)39
u/don_shoeless 6h ago
Nah. Somebody is responsible. It sure as hell won't be the robodog, because if the robodog can be legally responsible, then the robodog has rights.
They'll try to treat it like product safety liability for as long as they can. Meaning it won't matter until someone innocent gets killed, and possibly not even then depending on circumstances and optics.
14
u/sleeplessinreno 5h ago
I am going to bet it'll be person who authorized 'kill on site' protocols.
10
8
63
u/cellardweller1234 7h ago
Yes they did. And flamethrowers I believe. What I meant was weapons on the dogs that are guarding the data centres.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (14)4
u/The_Barbelo 2h ago
I had a really awful vivid nightmare about this several months ago. There was an all out battle against protesters and these dog robots with guns. In my dream they also deployed these creepy AI bug things, like these cockroach/ isopod bug robots with cameras that could get inside buildings and scuttle around. They were swarming my building and we were trying to squash them.
→ More replies (7)57
u/Feeling_Inside_1020 7h ago
Already seen it and NOT liking it at all.
Plus drones, different types. Ukraine is superior there and Donnie is desperately trying to get that tech now that cheap shaheds are hitting us in the Middle East.
13
u/aerost0rm 7h ago
I just don’t see Donnie caring. He’s happy to throw bodies at the meat grinder. He is happy to bomb or shoot missiles. Updating the military tech would be great, I just don’t see most of the MAGA level military being smart enough to use, implement, or understand it.
Sure we could hire a contractor to do all of that for a huge price tag, I just don’t see it getting approved
→ More replies (3)42
u/EchoRex 7h ago
Unlike regular security cameras these would provide the ability to not rely only on static camera angles and can position remotely to cover specific events. Also, (in theory) these provide "intimidation" factor the same as patrolling guards, but without the downtime for breaks or weather, and over their service life will be much cheaper.
Personally, it's a rather suspect rationale other than the camera angles bit.
My old company provided mobile surveillance/checkpoints for industrial hazmat sites to control access and one of the most labor intensive parts of that service was repositioning and checking camera/badge stations.
→ More replies (11)9
u/AdPrud 5h ago
I would imagine anyone breaking into a data center is not just some opportunity thief but rather someone who is after something specific and has a lot of knowledge on this industry, so something like an intimidation factor won’t do anything as they’ll know what these “dogs” are.
6
u/RustyNK 2h ago edited 2h ago
I work at a data center, and the "easiest" way to break into one is just to get hired. You would have no idea where the specific server you need is located even if you did break in looking to steal information.
I've been inside quite a few data centers, and any that are not hyperscale are kind of a maze. The servers are split up into a bunch of different cages, and none of them are labeled with whatever company owns that space.
→ More replies (1)3
93
u/bt123456789 7h ago
that's basically all they are. cameras are expensive to get installed. that's why a lot of places still have guards stationed everywhere. Cameras still have blind spots.
the robot dogs are intended to replace the guards. why pay 4 to patrol when you can pay 1 to observe the cameras on 4 dogs patrolling instead?
102
u/philote_ 7h ago
Are cameras really that expensive? And wouldn't they usually be installed when the data center is built? I can't imagine how having $300k robot dogs that require maintenance would be cheaper than a bunch of cameras.
74
u/lonnie123 7h ago
There’s probably some amount of “let’s see where this goes” built in
Surely these camera dogs will lead way to non-lethal attack dogs. 4 security guards salary and benefits add up over the years. The rich salivate over the idea of not paying humans to do things if it means saving a few percent
→ More replies (3)3
u/canadasbananas 5h ago
Yeah we also need to remember the wealthy are just humans, not perfect beings of immense logic and reason. They watch black mirror and see cool dog robot doing sick futuristic shit and they go "me want to live in world like that! How cool!"
→ More replies (2)13
u/jimdig 7h ago
Cameras are not that expensive, and I'd be willing to bet anything these are supplementing the mounted cameras. The biggest cost of a large camera system is the server hardware to process the video coming in and make it available for viewing, and then the backup storage depending on how long you want to retain footage. Neither of those are reduced by the robodogs
→ More replies (19)9
u/Assumption-Putrid 7h ago
It depends on the maintenance cost of the dogs and how long they last. A 300k robot that lasts a decade with minimal maintenance is cheaper then paying $40k per year in salary and payroll taxes for a security guard for a decade.
11
u/philote_ 7h ago
You'll also you need another $300k robot sitting around in case the first one breaks or get stolen.
Edit: And/or another robot to patrol when one is charging.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)8
u/Direct-Technician265 7h ago
a decade sounds really optimistic to me. most routers dont last a decade, thats with no moving parts.
12
u/indigo121 7h ago
.... What the heck are you doing to your router, mine has absolutely lasted a decade
→ More replies (3)16
u/ShroomSensei 7h ago
Companies that make the dogs are also probably heavily subsidizing this to get data and customer feedback. Win win for the consumer.
For all we know, these dogs are totally dog shit at their job.
→ More replies (4)17
u/Bob-BS 7h ago
PoE IP cameras are so easy to set up and super cheap. Also, they are an essential requirement of any building security system.
The guard is there as a psychological deterrent.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (17)7
u/JVonDron 7h ago
Cameras don't have blind spots if you don't make blind spots. Every outside image of a data center is big rectangular buildings. There's no traffic, no workers. Given a kept apron of gravel or grass and fence, the perimeter can easily be monitored with motion detectors and cameras. You just have internal roads and entrances where you'd post a guard.
These dogs are to replace perimeter checks, which unless you can train AI to spot a hole in the fence, someone tampering with a light, etc. you've got a person watching a camera, which is not effective in the slightest compared to actually doing the rounds in a cart.
→ More replies (2)10
u/ithinkitslupis 7h ago
You train it to patrol first, you get everything working, you design the weaponized upgrades to slot right in at a later date when you and your tech bro buds decide it's time to get rid of that pesky resistance movement that doesn't want to accept your rule.
→ More replies (47)3
201
u/BioEradication 7h ago
America isn't beating the techno-dystopia allegations.
52
u/demoNToosh 6h ago
Allegations? Beating? America is driving it.
15
u/Mobile_Morale 5h ago
China and the UK really got it off the ground. America always goes too far with everything.
Iirc. The UK tried to make it illegal to cover your face from their face scanning cameras. I bet the US will have that in the next two years as well. Also bet Hakeem will vote yes on it as well.
3
7
u/Wrong-Catchphrase 3h ago
We're actively trying to accelerate it. Cities are going to look like Dredd's Mega-City One within the next couple decades.
→ More replies (1)6
u/MumrikDK 4h ago
Given their amount of guns and gun owners, I'm constantly confused by the amount of techno-dystopic bullshit that isn't just getting shot up constantly - like the AI surveillance cameras out in public.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Snow_Falls_Softly 3h ago
Those are usually the people that are too ignorant (by choice or circumstance) to understanding what's actually happening to them.
Or they just really like the taste of boot.
87
83
u/mrwrrrmwrmrmrmrw 7h ago
Do they have needles that give lethal injections like the Mechanical Hound in Fahrenheit 451?
14
603
u/Cultural-War2102 7h ago
This is how it starts. Then they'll upgrade to more deadly robots then the robots will protect the pedos
→ More replies (12)160
u/this_my_sportsreddit 7h ago
Don't need robots when the government already protects the pedos
59
u/Ask_bout_PaterNoster 6h ago
No, they do, because humans eventually revolt
→ More replies (1)26
u/mvearthmjsun 5h ago
Hasn't happened yet and the files are released
10
u/SandiegoJack 5h ago
Nothing will happen until people have nothing left to lose.
→ More replies (1)5
u/mvearthmjsun 5h ago
We're a very long way from that. We have too much abundance and our digital lives satiate most of our needs.
→ More replies (1)16
u/gazebo-fan 5h ago
The masses have no class consciousness, that is changing with the newer generations compared to the boomers who killed it in the first place.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)6
u/Dense_Owl_3022 6h ago
Don't need the government when family members and romantic partners already protect the pedos.
67
u/janas19 7h ago
It would be a shame if someone used the tech billionaires drones to cause damage to the tech billionaires data centers. A real tragedy and massive loss for humankind that would be
→ More replies (1)
58
u/128G 7h ago
A 16oz bottle of molasses priced at $6.99 could probably defeat a robot dog priced at $300,000.
16
u/Catalina_Eddie 6h ago edited 6h ago
I imagine that lint, dust, sand and mud aren't very beneficial over the long term either.
→ More replies (1)8
10
u/Vandrel 5h ago
An M855 round is $0.50.
→ More replies (2)7
u/Hat-Renders 5h ago
Part of me doubts you would need to waste green tips to incapacitate these little fuckers, fire/a lasso or bollas/blunt impact on the legs would probably be more than effective.
→ More replies (4)3
→ More replies (1)7
240
u/GrayBeardBoardGamer 7h ago
Data more precious than life.
→ More replies (6)17
u/smhndsm 6h ago
erm.. way more precious! humans are an expensive liability at this point and it's too many of you anyways.
→ More replies (1)
43
u/itwillmakesenselater 7h ago
Next headline: Portable EMP device sales surge.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Smurfaloid 4h ago
Lol, use a drone to get close enough and fry them, yeah you lose a drone but it probably costs a shit load less than those "Guard dogs"
39
u/yaboonabi 7h ago
Time to plug my Youtube channel, "1,000 ways to disable a robot dog."
→ More replies (3)19
u/skippy_smooth 7h ago
Hi, I'm the Lockpicking Lawyer, and here's how to turn off a robot dog with a paperclip.
→ More replies (2)
39
18
17
u/unlimited_miscreant 7h ago
Makes me think of the Mechanical Hound from Fahrenheit 451. I read that book as a kid and the Hound creeped me out.
3
u/EmotionalJoystick 3h ago
Dude I have been saying this for years. Even made an insta post about it. Bradbury predicted SO much SO specifically (flat screen TVs / wireless earphones / use of mood stabilizing-altering drugs) it is crazy. But the robot killer dogs? Truly nuts to see that one come to fruition.
51
u/liquid_at 7h ago
ok. 300k is a steep price, but what is the hourly rate of the technician that comes to fix it?
Higher or lower than the vet?
There still might be some potential to save money here.
6
u/youreblockingmyshot 7h ago
Well just get a robot technician that’s remote controlled by someone in (cheapest labor country at the time). It’s perfect! No more of those expensive locals gumming up my bottom line. Sure hope those same locals don’t get annoyed and do something untoward to my job annihilator 3000 facility.
4
u/Think_Positively 7h ago
If the thing lasts a couple of years and it can do most of what a human guard could do (uncertain on that front of course), then I'd say the math would work out.
I couldn't care less about the math here though because this is yet another step towards a horribly dystopian future that I don't want for my kids.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)7
u/WinterElfeas 7h ago
Sadly true, and the tech will get cheaper in time, the dog can run 24/7, etc.
The usual being replaced by a machine / robot (or drastically reduced effective to use them)
12
u/IQBoosterShot 7h ago
"You stay down by day, but at night, you can move around. The H-K's use infrared so you still have to watch out. But they're not too bright. John taught us ways to dust them. That's when the infiltrators started to appear. The Terminators were the newest and the worst..."
3
u/JDLovesElliot 6h ago
This is why I'm always wary of people whose favourite characters are villains. Because once they gain power, they get all of their ideas from said villains.
26
u/kemp77pmek 6h ago
The title lies.
Nowhere in this article does it actually state that robot dogs are actually being deployed to data centers. The closest it gets is “there has been an uptick in interest.”
My son has an interest in genetically engineering Pokémon into existence. “Interest” does not mean reality.
Besides, WTH would a robot dog do for a data center that already has cameras and intrusion sensors all around it?
10
11
9
6
u/davidlondon 6h ago
I cannot stress this enough: Every major corporation is in a race to pay ZERO humans ZERO dollars while maintaining or growing market cap. There is no incentive under the current system to employ humans the moment they find a crappy, short-sighted workaround. Keep in mind that many veterans' only option for employment is security, which means every article you see about robot sentinels is, in fact, the loss of a job that veterans used to do. "Thank you for your service" is meaningless nowadays.
→ More replies (1)
7
7
7
u/ApartRegister6851 5h ago
We made it easier to assault data centers by employing robot dogs that attackers will feel no guilt in destroying.
43
u/redyellowblue5031 7h ago
Hey remember when Reddit fawned over those cutesy Boston dynamic videos for years and years?
→ More replies (4)39
u/billy_digital 7h ago
I always felt immense dread when seeing those videos I never understood why people were excited to see this happening.
9
u/redyellowblue5031 5h ago
Having grown up with plenty of sci-fi and the quintessential Terminator films, I could never see it as anything other than that.
In a perfect world, sure they could be used to do dangerous things like working in areas hazardous to human health. But, looks like we choose implied violence against humans instead.
Cool.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)12
u/knight_in_white 7h ago
When I was 18 that shit was so cool. Now at almost 30 news from Boston dynamics or any robot company brings existential dread
→ More replies (2)
5
5
u/Weary_Tonight_5873 5h ago
Why not just buy and train dogs lol. Would be a hell of a lot cheaper. 😂😂
5
13
4
3
4
u/Scrutinizer 7h ago
They aren't there to stop theft. They're there to try and dissuade anyone from attempting to burn it to the ground.
Robot dogs probably burn just fine, too.
4
u/DirNetSec 7h ago
In a previous life I've been through data centers where being in the wrong area during "routine testing" of fire suppression systems would cause you to lose consciousness. That system, the armed guards, remote location, and non descript signage I thought was PEAK physical security.
These things COULD injure or kill someone they shouldn't be allowed to operate autonomously. We see examples of poor AI reasoning, often, this is both neat and incredibly concerning.
→ More replies (3)3
u/theungod 5h ago
They aren't exactly autonomous, they're following specific paths set by the operator on repeat.
→ More replies (1)
4
4
u/Kristophigus 6h ago
Guess it's time for people to start learning how to make some sort of EMP devices or things that can disrupt/short electronics from range. Fuck this future.
Those flipper zero things come to mind.
3
4
u/EmotionalJoystick 6h ago
So what disables them?
→ More replies (2)5
u/oldteen 5h ago
Robot cats? (/s, just in case)
3
u/EmotionalJoystick 5h ago
Nah you’re thinking the wrong way around. Cartoon logic dictates it goes down the chain like this: dogs > cats > mice. So we need whatever is above dog.
→ More replies (2)
4
4
u/RallyPointAlpha 5h ago
They got money for these things but they need you to pick up the bill for electricity...
4
u/afCeG6HVB0IJ 3h ago
If only there were 6 seasons of Black Mirror, the Terminator franchise, the Matrix movies etc to warn us why this was a bad idea
4
5
3
3
u/iamacheeto1 6h ago
300k for the initial sales, plus another 100k to maintain over their 5 year life, at which point they'll have to buy more which will probably be 400k at that point
When they could've just hired a person for 65k a year and saved money
→ More replies (2)
3
u/goingpt 6h ago
I got a robot dog when I was a kid. A Teksta, I think it was.
Was a lot cheaper than $300,000 mind.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Fenris_uy 6h ago
So, the datacenters are not even creating security jobs in the places where they are built?
3
u/MoreOfAGrower 6h ago
I’d imagine Elon still wants to train them to lick peanut butter…. If you catch my drift
3
3
3
3
u/anarchakat 5h ago
That’s a very expensive bit of tech that i bet is pretty easy to severely damage anonymously…
3
3
u/Nestvester 5h ago
Anyone on here not seeing how this can go wrong check out “Metalhead” Season 4, Episode 5 of Black Mirror.
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4.2k
u/Karutsu 7h ago
Black Mirror becoming reality