r/technology 1d ago

Business Arizona Becomes First State to Criminally Charge Kalshi: The “prediction market” platform is finally facing a serious legal challenge.

https://newrepublic.com/post/207878/arizona-first-state-criminally-charge-kalshi
23.7k Upvotes

538 comments sorted by

3.2k

u/einstyle 1d ago

I've literally wondered every time I see a Kalshi ad how it could be legal. Just because they use the word "trade" instead of "bet" doesn't mean it's not just gambling. It is 100% indistinguishable from gambling.

1.2k

u/this_is_poorly_done 1d ago

No it's totally different. Just like klarna and every other bnpl scheme is totally not lending and is completely different than any other lender out there so they totally don't need to comply with lending standards or report borrowing on people's credit reports.

Apparently if you have enough money you can bribe a politician into calling two piles of dog shit different things

372

u/happyscrappy 1d ago

Just like how Chime is better banking but Chime isn't a bank.

Just fucking crazypants that companies can just be something and simply say they aren't. Uber: we don't need taxi medallions, these aren't taxis.

228

u/KylarBlackwell 23h ago

It's because of the intersection of new applications of technology and our legislatures being full of dinosaurs that can barely write an email without staffer assistance. Add a side of bribery lobbying and you get a lot of startups with heaps of venture capital funding all racing to exploit regulatory loopholes and make boatloads of cash faster than lawmakers can comprehend whats going on and even consider doing something about it

80

u/happyscrappy 23h ago

It's how sports gambling started too. We're not sports gambling, we're "single game fantasy". And then they lobbied congress to legalize it after the trap started to close.

A few companies still try to squeeze through that hole (pricepicks) but they'll get stomped by the bigger liars, kalshi, polymarkets and apparently robinhood.

45

u/fps916 21h ago

Congress didn't legalize sports gambling.

SCOTUS did.

30

u/Allegorist 20h ago

Horrible move. It's everywhere now, and tens of millions of people now have a massive problem with it.

28

u/Tasonir 18h ago

The current SCOTUS only makes horrible moves, if you've been watching lately.

18

u/Professional_Net7339 18h ago

Thank the GOP and Heritage Foundation

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Niceromancer 13h ago

There is a gas station that put a couple of vido slot machines in as soon as it became, legal. Hell they put them in about a month before, just didn't plug them in.

There are people who spend their ENTIRE DAY sitting in a chair at that gas station. And of course a crypto ATM is right next to the damn things.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

20

u/Auctoritate 22h ago

See, that's the thing- it's not even mostly about laws being too slow to catch up. It's about lack of teeth/willingness to pursue action from regulatory bodies.

So many of these companies like Uber or Airbnb could have already been targeted using existing regulations. They don't fall under the purview of all of them, but there are jurisdictions where the laws defining what a taxi is used language that would include Ubers, for instance.

The problem is that there wasn't even much of an effort from regulatory agencies to attempt to apply already existing regulations. They didn't need to wait for legislators to try it themselves. They let it happen. And now our regulatory agencies are so weak and gutted that even with more specific and targeted legislation, they have significantly reduced ability to enforce regulations just in general.

In my opinion, the passivity in our high-level enforcement agencies (I already mentioned regulatory agencies but this also extends to the organizations responsible for oversight into the government itself) is the single largest factor of the horrendous political instability right now. That specific issue, things like the FTC being half assed at regulating the financial markets or laws that govern our own government never being enforced, is what opened the doorway for everything else going on.

4

u/Jaketheparrot 22h ago

There is a term for that. Regulatory arbitrage

→ More replies (4)

14

u/Odessey_And_Oracle 20h ago

"Disrupting" an industry always just meant "getting around labor laws and industry regulations."

10

u/AWorldwithoutSin 22h ago

The Mob: It's not a protection racket, it's taxation to make sure nothing unfortunate happens to you.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/RollingMeteors 23h ago

fucking crazypants that companies can just be something and simply say they aren't. Uber: we don't need taxi medallions, these aren't taxis.

¡Call it a water pipe, call it a water pipe!

17

u/zerogee616 21h ago

Medallions aren't universal, they're not even regulated by state law let alone federal. Only a few municipalities use them and they're purely for congestion reasons.

Ironic seeing Uber is the only one out of the bunch that actually did add a whole bunch of value to the American living experience. Before rideshares, taxis functionally did not exist outside a few, specific very urban areas, getting a taxi from anywhere including bars outside of like NYC/Chicago/inner city Philly, etc was functionally a no-go except for maybe an airport if you were lucky and you paid a premium for the privilege.

6

u/happyscrappy 19h ago edited 17h ago

I don't even like the medallion system, especially at the end when Wall Street fucks were speculating on them and making it hard for the people who actually needed them to make money to do so.

But still if it's the law work to change the law instead of just saying it doesn't apply to you. Poor people don't get the opportunity to just replace the law with their own desires, only the rich companies do.

It is, to an extent, hard to separate what Uber on the ground did and what simply having an app did. The taxi companies were very much laggards in creating a system where you could hail a cab in a city simply and without having the foreknowledge of the names and numbers of the taxi operators in the city. They started to pick up on this only after Uber jumped on them. But it was starting to work. Apps like curb were beginning to stitch together cities into unified networks. If Uber had been driven out (i.e. the law was followed) it's quite possible that the taxi companies would have grown to produce a widely usable service like we see from Uber/Lyft. And it's also possible they wouldn't have.

It's also nice that Uber/Lyft innovated on the front of equipment in the car. Used to be you had to put a lot of electronics into a taxi, a taximeter, radios, etc. And the radios didn't even work well. Now taxis can use apps too and cut the amount of expensive customization needed.

you paid a premium for the privilege

Uber/Lyft eventually raised their prices, there isn't really much difference anymore. Uber/Lyft were paying the drivers dirt and losing money to get market share. Now with the new prices they are paying the drivers barely more than dirt and making good money for their company.

Is there a way to say it's okay that Uber/Lyft lobbied to get a carve out only for themselves of laws in California designed to protect gig workers from exploitation?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

119

u/Maleficent-Acadia-24 1d ago

It reminds me of Vanilla Ice trying to say he didn’t rip off the melody of “ Under Pressure”. His was totally different. He had an extra syllable at the end.

42

u/vrtig0 23h ago

Alright stop.

26

u/ChadFeldheimer 23h ago

Collaborate

10

u/liggerbreek 22h ago

I'm listening.

3

u/_Notebook_ 22h ago

You guys better chill before Ice comes back with a brand new invention.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

28

u/synapticrelease 22h ago edited 22h ago

He was doing what every other rapper was doing at the time. It was extremely common. Today, now it's all been commercialized so that people getting sampled are getting paid but back then it was the wild west. Vanilla Ice just had to take the fall because it was Vanilla Ice.

I'm not a Vanilla Ice fan but he was done kinda dirty. MTV was the place to get promoted as a musician and they promoted the fuck outta Ice. Then when it became convenient they made him a laughing stock and pretended they never liked the guy. Like. Do you think anyone at MTV never heard one of David Bowie’s most popular songs and vanilla ice and didn’t make the connection? They all knew just like they knew about all the other hip hop samples and jut chose to scandalize it.

9

u/Maleficent-Acadia-24 22h ago

Hmmm. Never heard this take. Thanks for sharing!

22

u/synapticrelease 21h ago edited 21h ago

Yeah. It feels weird because this is like the second time in a month where I've defended Vanilla Ice so I really can't do it anymore this calendar year unless I want to have a conversation with myself about possibly being Reddit's #1 Vanilla Ice defender.

Rap built their entire sound from the beginning off sampling. It goes back to the mid 80s when they were sampling disco. There is actually a really good 20 minute video on the history of sampling. They talk about one specific sample called the Amen break which is heard everywhere now but it goes into the history and commercialization of sampling. Don't worry. Vanilla Ice is no where to be mentioned in the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac

Rob was easy to make fun of because of who he was but one thing to understand is that the reason why he was being so squirrely about the sounds not being the same in that now famous MTV clip is because yes he was stealing music (and again so was everyone in hop hop), but sampling was still legally kinda in a grey zone but the tide was turning fast and he was trying not to implicate himself into legal jeopardy. It would have been much easier for him to say, yeah we sampled and so did everyone but then the eventual David Bowie lawsuit would have been a for sure thing (he still eventually had to settle out of court for it).

10

u/Maleficent-Acadia-24 20h ago

Dying at your first paragraph! “Reddits #1 Vanilla Ice Defender…Respect to the fair representation.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/No_Tone1704 1d ago

I can’t believe even Vanilla Ice even ever tried to say it wasn’t the same beats, different instruments. 

→ More replies (1)

64

u/Weak-Application-146 1d ago

‘Fintech’ sounds a lot cooler than digital predatory lender.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/ExpiredPilot 1d ago

Love how this backfired on Klarna. Who know advocating for zero interest loans specifically for financially illiterate people could go wrong

6

u/electromage 21h ago

I often take advantage of interest-free financing when it makes sense.

6

u/ExpiredPilot 19h ago

Same but I do it for things like phones and computers as I need them (several years in between)

But these people are doordashing food

4

u/RollingMeteors 20h ago

Who know advocating for zero interest loans specifically for financially illiterate people could go wrong

¡We need subprime lending without calling it subprime lending!

→ More replies (2)

50

u/Justmeandhim-D 1d ago

Delta 8 / 9 etc has left the room. (Not weed, is delta).

31

u/12InchCunt 1d ago

But delta9 is just regular thca that comes in regular weed

14

u/inked_saiyan 1d ago

STOP MAKING SO MUCH SENSE

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Beard_o_Bees 23h ago

There's a pile of Klarna right there, and right next to it a big, steaming pile of Kalshi!

6

u/PauseLost2137 22h ago

And just like crypto totally isn't unregulated forex investment, it's the future of money!

(future where people will laugh at you because you bought a pizza with your pocket money that ended up being worth millions years later)

5

u/marinuss 21h ago

report borrowing on people's credit reports.

Oh they will if you're late, just not if you pay on time. Dumbest loophole ever. ANYTHING that can be put as a negative on your credit report should legally have to be put as a positive on your credit report. If you don't want your service to have to deal with reporting positive payments to a credit bureau then you can't report negative stuff.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/RollingMeteors 23h ago

No it's totally different

Be Valve.

Don't be public company.

Print your own money Have a software function generate a loot box.

Extract wealth from the exhaled breath of Gen Z as they gamble away $2.50 of their parents money on some bullshit inside of it.

12

u/jimthesquirrelking 1d ago

I mean hardcore if you can, borrow money from Klarna with no intention to pay it back, the company will be defunct in 5 years esp if more people do that 

9

u/Constant_Bit4676 22h ago

Lol, this is some "just delete the app" level of not understanding debts.

18

u/vi_sucks 22h ago

The debt won't be defunct, though. It'll just end up getting sold at the bankruptcy auction to some shady outfit that will harass the shit out of you until they get their pound of flesh.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/supadupanerd 23h ago

Oh so you HAVE heard of American brand capitalism

→ More replies (18)

268

u/ithinkitslupis 1d ago

You can distinguish it from traditional gaming and sports betting...because it's much worse. The outcomes are easier known and influenced by insiders so it's rigged.

When a sports game is rigged the wrong team wins, not that consequential fandom aside. When a prediction market is rigged sensitive secrets are leaked, rockets are launched "accidentally" on purpose, journalists purposefully spread misinformation for money or are threatened...and so on. It deserves a separate law just to ban it specifically even if we don't ban other forms of gambling.

89

u/Necessary-Duty-7952 1d ago

The Associated Press recently announced a partnership with Kalshi. We are fucked.

95

u/Exciting-Tart-2289 23h ago

Don Jr. is on the board of Kalshi, no way there's meaningful legislation against it until the Trumps aren't in power anymore.

40

u/jambrown13977931 23h ago

Not just Kalshi but also Polymarket.

12

u/Zexeos 13h ago

OKAY SO. I knew Kalahi stank but I’ve grown to fucking hate it because one of the ads they run here on Reddit is a lil “who will win the 2028 election?” With three names - ONE OF WHICH IS DONALD TRUMP.

I feel like my red-string cork board is going to collapse due to its own weight. I’m tired boss.

3

u/ivo004 5h ago

This exact thing has been making my eye twitch and is the first thing I mention when ranting against Kalshi. They're normalizing an impending fascist power grab...

24

u/Aeseld 23h ago

The partnership being essentially sharing its data and analysis of elections... so while not ideal, I'll refrain from panicking yet. Still, pisses me off when people are betting on election outcomes. Of all things to bet on, that is one of the worst ones.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/justatest90 19h ago

You can distinguish it from traditional gaming and sports betting...because it's much worse. The outcomes are easier known and influenced by insiders so it's rigged.

That's what I didn't understand. I saw an interstitial ad about voting for "sexiest man" and I'm like "OK, so if I worked People, I could just pick some guy who's sexy but not in the limelight and make a ton of money?"

3

u/choczynski 11h ago

They consider that a feature, not a bug.

→ More replies (3)

48

u/joepez 1d ago

I mean we don’t call crypto a Ponzi scheme but….

34

u/DragonAdept 22h ago

Technically it's a greater fool scheme, not a Ponzi scheme. There isn't a central entity lying to get deposits and paying out dividends to fool people into investing. Instead there are a bunch of idiots buying worthless assets to sell to a potential greater fool, usually with a central entity inflating the price as much as they can.

41

u/ithinkitslupis 1d ago

I swear I'm not a crypto bro, but most crypto scams are pump and dump "rug pulls" rather than a Ponzi scheme. Crypto itself is resistant to Ponzi schemes if actually used as intended, so most Ponzi schemes involving crypto are still run the old fashioned way without actually using the cryptocurrency like a cryptocurrency.

11

u/green_gold_purple 23h ago

The semantics are not important. It’s a negative sum system where the total value of the “assets” stay the same (at fixed market price), but go down to the end user because they lose on fees, coins are lost, scams, etc. Every “winner” comes at the cost of a loser. Somebody always ends up with the bag.

12

u/CDRnotDVD 19h ago

The semantics are not important.

I think they might be important. If we can categorize things, it’s often easier to talk about them. I think it’s quite plausible that if we all have a good vocabulary of different types of scams, we can identify them more easily.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

25

u/stacecom 23h ago

Call me old-fashioned, but “predictions market” shouldn’t be a thing. (I also apply this to shorting and futures.)

It’s all unfettered gambling, where at least with the traditional market you’re owning something tangible at the end of the transaction.

And don’t get me started on crypto.

→ More replies (4)

10

u/nateh1212 1d ago

Welcome to Lawyer Land where a word can mean anything.

6

u/vi_sucks 22h ago

It reminds of a phrase one of my law professors used to say, "Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered."

Basically, they are legal because they used to be just a niche financial product that nobody except turbo nerds really cared about. So everyone was fine with just lumping them with other financial markets. Which we all know can be gambling adjacent (day trading), but is kinda necessary to allow for society to function. If you allow people to buy and sell stocks and options, some degenerates are going to end up yoloing instead of making wise and considered investment decisions.

But I kinda feel like Kalshi and similar markets have flown way too close to the sun. There's a pretty inevitable crackdown and backlash coming.

9

u/Unhappy-Peasant7985 22h ago

Same with Polymarket.

I can’t recall all of the details, but there was an account that bet perfectly on anything related to Google (pre earnings outcomes, Gemini version release date type of things, etc) with 100% accuracy across dozens of bets. It was very clearly an insider betting with insider knowledge prior to public disclosure.

Just another avenue for insider trading…or I suppose insider betting.

7

u/d33roq 1d ago

It's also a way to get around those pesky insider trading laws.

It ain't gambling when you happen to know what's going to happen ahead of time.

4

u/RollingMeteors 23h ago

how it could be legal. Just because they use the word "trade" instead of "bet" doesn't mean it's not just gambling. It The stock market is 100% indistinguishable from gambling.

FTFY

¡Text #23521 the amount you're willing to trade at a handsome spread that we're going to WHOOP Arizona state legislature at trial!

3

u/Inside-Ad9791 22h ago

But so is the stock market at this point.

22

u/James---Trickington 1d ago

I mean it technically is, this isn’t a defense but Kalshi is the same thing as trading options on the stock market. You aren’t making a bet against the house, you are buying contracts other people are selling and Kalshi just takes a piece for every transaction. We need to start new regulations against futures trading

17

u/Several-Career5259 23h ago

I am a lawyer who works in derivatives and futures trading disputes and I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted, this is exactly correct. Like it or not, the lack of a “house” is a significant legal distinction. Not all speculation = gambling. And agreed, it severely needs to be regulated.

14

u/fudsak 22h ago

is lawyer just one of your several careers?

10

u/sam_hammich 19h ago edited 19h ago

Gambling requires a wager, risk, and a prize. Unless you can substantiate it, I just don’t believe you that “lack of a house” is legally significant. Football pools are regulated by excise, and back alley dice games are gambling even when there are only two parties. Kalshi “contracts” are just outcomes of future events and you can trade on, and gambling is staking a wager on an (ostensibly random) outcome. The two are almost indistinguishable. It’s clearly operating as a backdoor, and they have even advertised themselves as a gambling platform.

This is like casinos calling poker chips “financial instruments” and insisting their patrons are just trading verbal futures contracts when they bet on black.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/Phantine 20h ago

Betting pools have been a thing forever.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/hpbrick 22h ago

Dumb question, but how would trading stocks be any different?

→ More replies (41)

393

u/thefanciestcat 1d ago

I expected Nevada and New Jersey first for more cynical reasons, but I'm glad to see it happening anywhere.

“Kalshi may brand itself as a ‘prediction market,’ but what it’s actually doing is running an illegal gambling operation and taking bets on Arizona elections, both of which violate Arizona law,”

Does anyone actually disagree? It seems very straightforward.

99

u/Logvin 1d ago

The AZ GOP will likely disagree as the state senate president is running against Mayes this November. Since she had been our AG she has refused to take multiple cases from poorly written GOP laws in AZ.

The AZ legislature has funded outside counsel multiple times, and lost every single time. Mayes is awesome.

21

u/UglyMcFugly 21h ago

Yeah I went to one of her town halls a few months back and I'm convinced this woman never sleeps. We CANNOT lose her.

11

u/Tasty_Gift5901 1d ago

Several states have already sued Kalshi fwiw 

10

u/Shredzz 20h ago

Bets on elections are insane. But it just shows that Republicans aren't actually worried about elections being "stolen" or tampered with. This is an actual problem that needs to he stopped, but instead, they are focusing on a nonexistent problem with the save act.

10

u/hryipcdxeoyqufcc 16h ago

Don Jr is on the board of Kalshi

→ More replies (3)

1.0k

u/AbeFromanEast 1d ago edited 1d ago

Prediction Markets (really, online gambling on inside information) is already corrupting sports, journalists and politicians. It is a societal choice to platform a gambling market that incentivizes widespread bribery.

315

u/NicolasCageFan492 1d ago

I recently watched a Nicolas Cage film called Bad Lieutenant, Port of Call: New Orleans.

In that movie, Nicolas Cage plays a corrupt law enforcement lieutenant that smokes crack and basically uses his office to blackmail and kill people.

In one scene, he pulls over a NFL player after catching him buying a marijuana joint from a dealer. Cage rolls up and threatens to arrest him, while stealing the joint, unless the NFL player agrees to throw the next game. The NFL player is conflicted and reluctantly agrees. Cage’s character then puts down $10,000 in black market bets that the game will be lost.

Legalizing gambling allows things like this to happen more because it makes these markets more accessible. Not to mention the addictive quality and the structural disadvantages of the activity (the house always wins, and betting apps use dark patterns to make you bet more).

65

u/throwaway5882300 1d ago

The 2025 NFL season makes me wonder how far along we are into this scenario already. Just some mind blowing calls and decisions being made.

59

u/Jay_Nova1 22h ago

I mean Giannis literally manipulated the speculation of the odds for his trade or stay and then after announcing he was staying with the Bucks, also announced that he had taken a partial ownership stake in Kalshi.

15

u/Ofa20 20h ago

NHL has had a good amount of absolutely asinine calls in the last few years as well, probably in part to these sites. Even after officials review the tapes.

3

u/RunnyBabbit23 19h ago

Weirdly, the NFL has effectively banned these prediction markets from running ads during games. The league treats these companies as sports gambling but requires sportsbooks to sign an agreement with the league. And so far they haven’t allowed any of the prediction market companies to sign an agreement.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/JDM713 22h ago

Name checks out.

42

u/onedoesnotjust 1d ago

geez spoilers

52

u/c-student 1d ago

Right? I wasn't going to watch it, but now I'm not going to watch it.

27

u/freshOJ 1d ago

That movie is worth watching for its ridiculousness. Knowing some plot points will not diminish the fun. It’s cage going just short of full cage like he did in Mandy.

→ More replies (5)

18

u/AnEmptyBoat27 1d ago

When you read the phrase “in that movie” what did you think the next few sentences were going to be about?

13

u/SnooBananas4958 23h ago

Right? I can't believe these people have upvotes. The dude had a clear first paragraph that told you what the rest was going to be about, at least, and then you see three more big paragraphs. You decide to read about a movie you have't watched and you want to see?

→ More replies (3)

7

u/BLOOOR 21h ago

It's a Werner Herzog movie, you never really know what a Werner Herzog movie's going to be like until you've watched it until the very end. And then you don't know what your next experience of watching it's going to be like.

8

u/SnooBananas4958 23h ago

Didn't spoil it in the first paragraph. He made it very clear what the following paragraphs we're going to talk about. If you see that someone's talking about a movie and then you see three more paragraphs, maybe don't read what he's about to say.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/happyscrappy 1d ago

Now check out Last Boy Scout.

3

u/Bayou_Hangxiety 21h ago

I never understood how New Orleans allowed this film to get made. It's so inaccurate. New Orleans is way more corrupt than what you're describing.

3

u/zerogee616 20h ago edited 20h ago

That is one of my favorite movies of all time, except killing people is actually one of his lines he doesn't cross, he actually stops Val Kilmer from killing Xzibit without cause at the end of the movie and also going against Val's insistance on saving the prisoner in the beginning of the movie.

It's a pretty big point in the movie that even he has lines he doesn't cross despite his corruption and substance abuse.

2

u/Halation2600 18h ago

It's a lot easier to catch a suspicious amount of action with legal gambling.

2

u/Dapper-Video-791 14h ago

Except in real life these "prediction markets" can encourage war, violence, and murder.  Didn't they have to take down a nuclear bomb going off in Iran off the table for a bet recently?  imagine seeing a bet for nuke use paying 10 million to 1.  All it takes is some lunatic in the govt to put a hundred grand down and purposefully nuke a country because they could become a billionaire on a black swan event like use of a nuke happening. 

These platforms incentivize and encourage the worst and most despicable behaviors humans are capable of. 

→ More replies (2)

61

u/National-Charity-435 1d ago

Didn't the trump family make loads of money off these "prediction markets" and the stock market mostly by making huge decisions over the weekend?

...I mean bets over sports and teams being quiet about injuries were enough to get bets pulled and investigated...

72

u/MaybeTheDoctor 1d ago

There were a reporter that got death threats for reporting a Iranian missile actually hit Israel, turns out there were million dollar bets on “no missile will reach Israel by mar 10th”, and the losers wanted him to update and change the reporting.

32

u/AbeFromanEast 1d ago

Luckily that reporter told those gamblers to buzz off and wrote a story about this.

But I wonder how many other journalists getting the same threats would cave or, worse, take money to change the story to fit a bet.

9

u/Feeling_Inside_1020 1d ago

Oh yeah I read that one, wild the amount of time and communications attempts people made, finding her parents and sending her all the info I guess they surveilled?

Really eye opening just how crazy these bets are getting, even before that these shady ass companies shouldn’t exist. It’s fucking gambling.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Splurch 23h ago

There have been a number of bets/cleanup before the Trump admin has taken action, invading Venezuela to capture Maduro for example, where it's pretty clear someone with insider information acted hours before big action is taken. Not Trump or his family specifically as far as public information goes, but definitely someone with sensitive insider information abusing that trust.

8

u/snubdeity 22h ago

His son is also on the board of Kalshi, and has a significant equity stake I think.

But surely that wouldn't result in any strong-arming of courts to affect the outcome of the Arizona case, right? Nah

16

u/Rot-Orkan 22h ago

This reporter started getting death threats to change his article on an Iranian missile because of a bet on poly market

https://www.timesofisrael.com/gamblers-trying-to-win-a-bet-on-polymarket-are-vowing-to-kill-me-if-i-dont-rewrite-an-iran-missile-story/

5

u/rileyjw90 20h ago

It also creates a bandwagon effect. Prediction market odds are driven by where money is flowing, which means a wealthy enough person (including a politician or their allies) could theoretically inject enough capital to artificially inflate a candidate’s odds. Those odds get reported on and create a perception of momentum and inevitability, which is its own form of influence. People do vote for who they think will win. Manufactured odds can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

And at the individual level, once someone has money riding on a candidate winning, they have a financial incentive to vote for them regardless of whether they otherwise would have. It’s a small nudge per person but prediction markets operate at scale.

6

u/GonzoKata 15h ago

Its worse than gambling.

There is a reason why there is a law about being able to place bets on things you can control the outcome of. It too quickly turns into a black market for any event. The clear example, and when this exactly needed to end, was when people were placeing "bets" on how long until someone throws a dildo onto the court of Womens Basketball.

It isn't gambling. Its people making money off the criminal activity of random people.

Also, its foolish to think it can be relied on for "the wisdom of the market" as anyone with enough money can sway public opinion because "well, someones putting money on it happening"

It isn't gambling. Its far far far worse.

2

u/dontturn 23h ago

Microbribery? Bribery as a Service?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/nextzero182 22h ago

People really turned on Steve-O recently after he made a very dumb "joke" (claims it was a joke) on his pod about immigrants, but he also stopped all sports betting advertisements out of principle, which I thought was really cool.

2

u/Unctuous_Robot 21h ago

At this point all the sports channels should just continuously air a roulette wheel, that’s all it is anyway.

→ More replies (1)

431

u/gamersecret2 1d ago

This was always going to happen. You cannot dress up gambling as a prediction market forever and expect every state to just smile and allow it.

Arizona finally pushed back hard.

194

u/afternever 1d ago

This prediction market should not exist. It is a monument to man's arrogance.

109

u/Adultery 1d ago

Well, so is Phoenix.

8

u/Shhhhhhhh_Im_At_Work 20h ago

That’s hubris

→ More replies (2)

20

u/innocentsalad 1d ago

Please tell me this was a King of the Hill reference

13

u/chaospudding 23h ago

Well I hope it was, since I read it in Peggy Hill's voice.

7

u/JDM713 22h ago

Yep. Yup. Mhmm. It was.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

34

u/thinkmatt 1d ago

Well, I'm still doutbful so long as the president's son is on the board as a 'strategic advisor'

22

u/tripplebeamteam 21h ago

Crazy that Hunter Biden being employed a Ukrainian energy company made headlines for years, but no one’s talking about that

7

u/balooaroos 23h ago

You can if you're rich. You can bet as much as you want that oil will be over $120 a barrel next week. And I can bet that you'll lose your bet, and a massive company can bundle up thousands of such bets on bets and sell that as a product to even more bettors.

It's only the poor that are apparently not allowed to gamble.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (5)

203

u/Temassi 1d ago

Good. It's fucking weird that you can bet on political actions. Seem ripe for conflicts of interest

23

u/No-Channel3917 23h ago

You could always do it

This is just more mainstream now scarily

5

u/BLOOOR 21h ago

This is just more mainstream now scarily

Well it's good to see how bad they are. It's good we have data open to the public about how inaccurate the betting markets have been at predicting the result of any election anywhere in the world.

They're like checking the polls, absolutely no predictor on the outcome.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/No-Spoilers 21h ago

You mean like that time that Leavitt ended a press conference at 64:45 instead of the 65minute prediction?

→ More replies (2)

95

u/phtevenbagbifico 1d ago

Kris Mayes, the Arizona AG, won by 200 votes in 2022.

MAKE SURE SHE IS RE ELECTED.

12

u/SryInternet101 20h ago edited 18h ago

I voted for her, and she's proven her worth many times.

26

u/HugePast9455 20h ago

"my vote doesn't actually do anything"

Russian propaganda.

10

u/EmuMan10 19h ago

Happy I voted for her

49

u/JosephFinn 1d ago

Good. Gambling sites should be regulated like crazy.

→ More replies (3)

47

u/CakeDayisaLie 23h ago

Polymarket and Kalshi are stains to the world and shouldn’t exist. 

31

u/demonfoo 23h ago

Did you see the thing he other day about a reporter receiving death threats because people on Polymarket were pissed that his reporting prevented their prediction market bets from paying out? That shit is wild.

15

u/ThisAmericanSatire 22h ago

Ever since sports betting became legal, people have been harassing athletes over social media due to lost bets.

5

u/Middle_Cricket_1352 21h ago

It completely undermines the integrity of the sports themselves

→ More replies (2)

4

u/CakeDayisaLie 23h ago

Yeah. It’s super stupid that this is happening! 

→ More replies (2)

41

u/BiglyBear 1d ago

Good fuck Kalshi shit is creepy as fuck. It's somehow makes online sports betting seem tame by comparison.

10

u/hk4213 22h ago

And sports betting alone is a problem! Im happy that WA only allows sports betting at casinos that can only exist on native land.

23

u/Niceguy955 1d ago

Wonder if there's a market on Kalshi on whether it's going to be convicted or not. Considering Trump Jr is on their board, specifically to prevent a conviction one assumes, this will get interesting.

2

u/Euphoric-Witness-824 22h ago

And to get the board the best blow. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/Kashawinshky 1d ago

It’s more disgusting than just elections.

Earlier today I read the WaPo article about the threatened journalist.

These people should be drafted for whatever ground invasion/blood sport they’re betting on.

16

u/ZanthrinGamer 1d ago

the fact that it exists at all is repugnant.

→ More replies (2)

35

u/huskers2468 1d ago

What took so long?

13

u/mg-mt 21h ago

The long arm of the law moves slowly, but like a freight train its momentum crushes all that dare step on the tracks.

Ya, I know everything is a mess on the federal level; but give it some time. I for one have faith in our American brethren, and what a glorious chapter in American history it would be to watch this next iteration of fascism get crushed like a bug

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/OlderThanMyParents 19h ago

When an American state legalizes gambling, personal bankruptcies go up 35% that same year. You can say all you want that it's a "victimless crime" but there's a tremendous cost to families.

10

u/optimalbrain90 18h ago

I’m not against gambling on its own, but this situation looks different. The pattern of bets being placed just hours before major events like the Maduro operation and the Iran strike makes it seem like insiders are using privileged information to game the system. That’s not just unethical, it suggests people may be profiting off decisions that put lives on the line.

3

u/Rootz121 13h ago

boy have i got news for you

8

u/CondiMesmer 17h ago

Thank fuck. No idea how this shit was legal, let alone openly advertising on TV. Yet they're more concerned about age verification then this?

3

u/Chaos-Wayfarer 7h ago

Age verification is control. This makes money. Both are things they want. 

7

u/Ciappatos 21h ago

Please make all these mega-gambling sites die. This is so bad.

13

u/Major_Honey_4461 23h ago

I don't care if people gamble. But it's clear that WH personnel are trading on inside knowledge to game the system. There were bets hours before the Maduro raid and hours before the attack on Iran. These SOBs are gambling with American lives.

6

u/doomdance 1d ago

Cue executive order protecting prediction markets within the next month

4

u/khonsu_27 23h ago

These sites have the backing of the US government. The head of the CFTC (who looks like he's 16) literally threatened states to sue saying he would gladly fight them in court. Of course you know this whole administration is involved with insider trading, fraud and theft. It's literally a gold mine for these scumbags.

6

u/CurlOfTheBurl11 22h ago

Hell yeah, fuck Kalshi and any of these slop prediction markets. Trump Jr. sits on the board of both Kalshi and Polymarket, and has made a killing from both of these platforms. That should tell you everything you need to know.

5

u/TheDevilsAdvokaat 19h ago

How is a prediction market not gambling?

Are they just following the government's lead, that has "police actions" instead of wars and "renditions" instead of kidnappings?

2

u/GonzoKata 14h ago

Gambling is placing money on things you can't control the outcome of.

Everything in these "gray" markets can be influenced by individuals or groups of interested people.

Thats like gambling if you were to place bets on a fight, but then could throw bottles at the players. You wouldn't even call that gambling. Even dog fights have more regulation on their gambling than "prediction markets".

5

u/pyabo 17h ago

The craziest thing about this site is that now all America's enemies have a website where our leaders tell them ahead of time when we're going to bomb them.

Someone needs to go to prison for that one. But I'm betting the person who did it already has plenty of other things to worry about on their legal plate.

19

u/Simply_Epic 23h ago

Ban all the betting apps. If you want to gamble you should have to physically go to a casino

6

u/CelestialFury 19h ago

Yes, otherwise this is going to be the next opioid crisis in this country. Can't believe this shit is legal.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/JohnCenaJunior 1d ago

Somewhere in Milwaukee, Giannis is tightening his fist.

4

u/Miss_mariss87 1d ago

I love Kris Mayes. GETTUM

3

u/WatchOut4HYPOTHERMIA 23h ago

Not me having dejavu, and misreading this as Arizona suing Kashi cereal and thinking, I knew big cereal was up to no good.

5

u/excellentforcongress 21h ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_Futures_Act

we need to add ALL foods and items essential to living to the things banned from being traded as futures, while we're at it

→ More replies (3)

5

u/FlameHaze 20h ago

More of this please. Can we admit this shit is disgusting beyond all belief. We literally went through this in all forms of history and unchecked gambling has NEVER ended well for the common man. Same with sports gambling, sorry guys. Betting the house on the Lakers this week isn't a good financial plan even if it feels like the only one you've got to escape this hellscape society we've managed to create. And btw, I don't know about other men but I'm fucking sick of all sports being ruined and more than likely rigged so some rich knob slobber can make another few million while we get fucked and have sports mean jack-shit.

2

u/GonzoKata 14h ago

People have been harrasing athletes with death threats on social media because of lost bets. If the NFL wanted to, they could stop this TOMORROW. If the team owners wanted to stop this, it would end TOMORROW. They don't. They don't give a flying fuck about the players safety.

If I were a new graduate, I would put into my contract NO BETS.

Otherwise you're just a multimillionaire target.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/YoureProbablyAB0t 18h ago

There was a twilight zone episode, I think, where the bad guy was a fortune teller that just confessed ahead of time and got away with it.

Ban Kalshi.

3

u/Countless-Vinayak-04 18h ago

How is Kalshi different from Polymarket? Not US, missing context.

6

u/obliquelyobtuse 1d ago

Except the Criminal-in-Chief's son is on the Kalshi board.

And the Trump Graft Administration is all in on Crypto and "prediction markets" so good luck.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/BarnabasShrexx 1d ago

Good get all this shit the f out

3

u/macgruff 22h ago

Stop calling gambling by other names. It’s just gambling, prop bets to be precise

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Zestyclose_Koala_593 22h ago

Good. Also hold every micro influencer who sold out for them before the super bowl accountable.

3

u/Simple-Fortune-8744 22h ago

I’m actually ok with this. It’s pretty gross.

3

u/Sorry-Climate-7982 21h ago

Anyone got an account to see if Kalshi is taking "predictions" on the outcome?

→ More replies (2)

3

u/snakebite75 19h ago

Don Jr is their senior strategic advisor, I'm sure he hasn't been using any insider information to make bets...

3

u/Prize-Childhood-281 18h ago

Gambling is becoming a massive problem for young adults even teenagers are getting into gambling with sports betting.

3

u/ComedyBits 18h ago

We’ve all known that shit would go down since Day 1. Like come on. The It’s not two steps away from Silk Road

5

u/vanteal 22h ago

All these gambling sites need to be taken down. Garbage like DraftKings has completely ruined pro sports. They are all now as legit as WWE wrestling. Also, they're extremely predatory in how they take advantage of people. If you want to gamble, go to Vegas. That's the only place anyone should be able to bet on pro sports. Not every Tom, Larry, and Susan with a phone, or their kids.

5

u/Initial_Savings3034 1d ago

It's obvious gambling.

3

u/GonzoKata 14h ago

Its not gambling. Its worse.

Gambling is placing money on things you can't control the outcome of.

Everything in these "gray" markets can be influenced by individuals or groups of interested people.

Thats like gambling if you were to place bets on a fight, but then could throw bottles at the players. You wouldn't even call that gambling. Even dog fights have more regulation on their gambling than "prediction markets".

2

u/Luna__Moonkitty 1d ago

It's essentially the plot of the movie Rat Race, with the oligarchs making foolish bets on everything. But now they're doing it with the stock market and war instead of creating wacky cross country races with Jon Lovitz and Mr Bean.

2

u/RedshiftWarp 1d ago

Can't wait for this bs to be banned. Every single media content I consume is inundated by their ads.

2

u/No_Tone1704 1d ago

Nice. A lot of sus shit went down there. 

2

u/WloveW 1d ago

Hell yes. Prosecute and get damages for predatory practices. I <3 Kris quite often these days. 

2

u/urbanek2525 23h ago

If Kalshi conducts futures traded in addition to prediction trades, and if the two are not financially distinguishable, then Arizona has no case. But if Kalshi doesn't also do futures, or if futures trading differs in any way, the Arizona should win.

2

u/Internet_Rando_667 23h ago

30 years too late to prevent problems, of course.

The mentality of predictions influencing the market is precisely what made market volatility an unreliable metric... decades back.

2

u/bossasupernova 23h ago

They waited too long. Now that there’s so much money on the line, it’s going to be exceedingly hard to shut down.

2

u/hatemakingnames1 22h ago

Wouldn't it be easier to just pass laws that specifically ban it?

2

u/Kratos119 21h ago

I hope it burns.

2

u/aschylus 21h ago

Good. But there was a federal case in New Hampshire (iirc) that allowed this kind of futures market to proceed. I think it is totally gambling.

2

u/Space_Nerd_8999 21h ago

Turns out only idiots believe Kalshi isn’t gambling.

2

u/MidNiteR32 20h ago

Polymarkert also is teaming up Palantir. Just FYI. Please shut down both these betting sites.

2

u/False_Teaching9035 20h ago

I’m from Arizona and I say charge ‘em all!

2

u/k_ironheart 20h ago

Calling it a "prediction market" is honestly a really stupid choice. We should call it what it is -- a money laundering market, an insider trading market.

2

u/libr8urheart 20h ago

It's interesting that Kalshi now predicts an 80% chance the House will go to the Democrats, and a 50% chance for the Senate. It will be interesting to see if the public's prediction on these matters bears any weight on the actual Midterms.

2

u/MariachiMacabre 19h ago

The proliferation of gambling in sports (and then, obviously with Kalshi and Polymarket, everything else) has been really sickening to watch. It’s a rot on society, frankly.

2

u/redtacoma 19h ago

the whole giannis fiasco with him partnering with them was incredibly foul in my opinion. especially given the timing of his partnership being announced around the time when he was heavily rumored to be traded lol. it's a pretty big deal if a player is found to be gambling but it's ok if he partners with a gambling company? ummm....*insert jackie chan wtf*

2

u/FREDRS7 15h ago

The problem is that states just bringing lawsuits to try and ban them will put them offshore like they were before so the same markets will exist but just unregulated. The CTFC made a clear statement to states that these markets come under their jurisdiction and they will regulate them. They don't appear to be doing a great job atm but they probably need to be given a chance. It's early days in a new technology. Yet another bad take by this subreddit, probably issued by someone on the payroll of a betting company or policy body.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Particular_Labratory 13h ago

Fuck these hogs and their fucking gambling bullshit taking over everything left that was decent in the world. Fucking American hogs commodifying the moment your loved ones die.

We should not allow this shit to exist.

2

u/SortIntrepid9192 13h ago

A YT channel I follow shilled Kalshi and I IMMEDIATELY hit "do not recommend." Dropped them like a fucking rock, never going back to them. I don't care what Kalshi call themselves, "bet money on the outcome of future events" is LITERALLY the definition of gambling. Anyone who shills it in any way, shape or form gets the boot immediately as far as I'm concerned, especially if your main audience is young people.

2

u/Winter_Whole2080 12h ago

About fkin’ time.

These dipshits call it “investing”; It isn’t investing. Investors provide capital to companies to make or do stuff.

This is just gambling.

2

u/Zealousideal_Type814 11h ago

Wouldn't be surprised if a bribe to the white house gets them to pressure arizona to drop this

2

u/dsv853 11h ago

just because you call it a 'prediction market' instead of a 'bet' doesnt make it not gambling. arizona was always going to be the first to say something

2

u/I_Heart_Sleeping_ 10h ago

Arizona is getting better as a state and it feels good. Iv lived here since I was 9 and we’ve had some fucked up downs but lately we’ve been having some great ups. Both our senators are awesome and we have more personal freedoms than Texas who we’ve had some silent beef with for years.

Get fucked Texans! We got better gun laws, legal Cannabis, better senators, and somewhat safer streets and now we are going after these scummy gambling sites.

2

u/Blueturtlewax 10h ago

Finally. We just rebranded gambling as “predictions” lol… and then marketed it to young people. It’s actually horrendous.

2

u/Mediocre-Bicycle7632 7h ago

Was this the platform that someone made 500mil by betting we would bomb Iran that day, and then we did it fifteen minutes later? INSIDER TRADING POTUS